From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752003AbeFDK1Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 06:27:25 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com ([67.231.152.168]:60446 "EHLO mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbeFDK1Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 06:27:24 -0400 Authentication-Results: ppops.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:27:19 +0100 From: Charles Keepax To: Andy Shevchenko CC: Lee Jones , , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Don't use regmap_read_poll_timeout Message-ID: <20180604102719.GA18740@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <20180511135030.14590-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> <20180604054452.GD17993@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=878 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806040128 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:40:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 11 May 2018, Charles Keepax wrote: > > >> + while (true) { > >> + ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val); > >> > >> + if ((val & mask) == target) > >> + return 0; > >> + > >> + if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) > >> + break; > >> + > >> + usleep_range(ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US / 2, > >> + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US); > >> + } > > >From my point of view infinite loops not good for readability and maintenance. > Perhaps > > do { > ... > } while (ktime_compare(...)); > > ? I would rather not do it that way since then it becomes impossible to have a single poll with no delays happening. I can refactor to remove the while(true) but it will make the code a bit bigger, as I will probably need to duplicate some code outside the loop. Thanks, Charles