[PATCH] Fixed an indentation error

[PATCH] Fixed an indentation error

[Parth Y Shah]

Signed-off-by: Parth Y Shah <sparth1292@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
index efba66c..0675b4a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
@@ -1217,8 +1217,8 @@ static void purge_configs_funcs(struct gadget_info *gi)
 			list_move_tail(&f->list, &cfg->func_list);
 			if (f->unbind) {
 				dev_dbg(&gi->cdev.gadget->dev,
-				         "unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
-				         f->name, f);
+						"unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
+						f->name, f);
 				f->unbind(c, f);
 			}
 		}
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] Fixed an indentation error

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 17:55 +0530, Parth Y Shah wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Parth Y Shah <sparth1292@gmail.com>

-ENOCHANGELOG

Why do you think this is an error?
Why is the dev_dbg useful at all?

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
[]
> @@ -1217,8 +1217,8 @@ static void purge_configs_funcs(struct gadget_info *gi)
>  			list_move_tail(&f->list, &cfg->func_list);
>  			if (f->unbind) {
>  				dev_dbg(&gi->cdev.gadget->dev,
> -				         "unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
> -				         f->name, f);
> +						"unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
> +						f->name, f);
>  				f->unbind(c, f);
>  			}
>  		}

[PATCH v2] Fixed a checkpatch error

[Parth Y Shah]

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible

Here, spaces are replaced by a tab in 2 lines.

Signed-off-by: Parth Y Shah <sparth1292@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
 * Updated commit description
 * Removed one extra tab and replaced spaces with tab to resolve
   checkpatch error

 drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
index efba66c..0251299 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
@@ -1217,8 +1217,8 @@ static void purge_configs_funcs(struct gadget_info *gi)
 			list_move_tail(&f->list, &cfg->func_list);
 			if (f->unbind) {
 				dev_dbg(&gi->cdev.gadget->dev,
-				         "unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
-				         f->name, f);
+					"unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
+					f->name, f);
 				f->unbind(c, f);
 			}
 		}
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH v2] Fixed a checkpatch error

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:02:46PM +0530, Parth Y Shah wrote:
> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
> 
> Here, spaces are replaced by a tab in 2 lines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Parth Y Shah <sparth1292@gmail.com>

Your subject line needs work, please see how other subject lines are
composed for this subsystem.

Also note, please do not use anything but the drivers/staging/ area of
the kernel for beginning "I'm going to do checkpatch cleanups" type of
"learning to get changes into the kernel" work.  That is a great place
to start with this, not in other subsystems where you might have
reviewers who do not care so much about whitespace cleanups like this.

So please learn the process there, and when you have it all working
well, then you could move on to other subsystems and areas of the
kernel, like this one, if you want to.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] Fixed an indentation error

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:55:10PM +0530, Parth Y Shah wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Parth Y Shah <sparth1292@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
> index efba66c..0675b4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
> @@ -1217,8 +1217,8 @@ static void purge_configs_funcs(struct gadget_info *gi)
>  			list_move_tail(&f->list, &cfg->func_list);
>  			if (f->unbind) {
>  				dev_dbg(&gi->cdev.gadget->dev,
> -				         "unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
> -				         f->name, f);
> +						"unbind function '%s'/%p\n",
> +						f->name, f);

I see no "error" with the original code here, please explain why this
needs to be changed.

thanks,

greg k-h