From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:46:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614144659.GC12198@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425f4d5b-d414-de46-f388-55f1e6821ba6@vmware.com>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:43:04PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> It's intended to be enforced by storing the algorithm choice in the
> WW_MUTEX_CLASS which must be common for an acquire context and the
> ww_mutexes it acquires. However, I don't think there is a check that that
> holds. I guess we could add it as a DEBUG_MUTEX test in ww_mutex_lock().
There is ww_mutex_lock_acquired():
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww_ctx->ww_class != ww->ww_class)
which should trigger if you try and be clever.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-14 7:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking,drm: Fix ww mutex naming / algorithm inconsistency Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 7:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 10:38 ` Andrea Parri
2018-06-14 11:10 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 11:49 ` Andrea Parri
2018-06-14 12:04 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 12:08 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-14 11:54 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-14 13:43 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-06-14 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-14 12:48 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 13:18 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2018-06-14 7:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: Change deadlock-avoidance algorithm for the modeset locks Thomas Hellstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180614144659.GC12198@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox