Re: [PATCH v13 3/8] clk: Use devm_ in the register fixed factor clock

Ricardo Salveti
2018-09-14T18:53:43Z

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM <ilia.lin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ilia Lin <ilialin@codeaurora.org>
>
> Use devm_clk_hw_register instead of clk_hw_register
> to simplify the usage of this API. This way drivers that call
> the clk_hw_register_fixed_factor won't need to maintain
> a data structure for further cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Lin <ilialin@codeaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> index a5d402de5584..8e39bda8e596 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct clk_hw *clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(struct device *dev,
> init.num_parents = 1;
>
> hw = &fix->hw;
> - ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, hw);

Not sure what is the current state of this patch-set, but this change
breaks drivers calling clk_hw_register_fixed_factor with a NULL dev
(e.g. imx_clk_fixed_factor), as devm_clk_hw_register needs a valid dev
for devres_add to work.

> if (ret) {
> kfree(fix);
> hw = ERR_PTR(ret);
> --
> 2.11.0

Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo