[PATCH 4.14 160/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-18T08:41:56Z

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047 ]

Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with
protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC).

But, we did not have a selftest for that. Now we do.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
expected_pk_fault(pkey);
}

+void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+ void *p1;
+ int scratch;
+ int ptr_contents;
+ int ret;
+
+ dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__);
+
+ p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
+ lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+ ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+ dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+
+ /* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */
+ ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
+ pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+ dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru());
+
+ /* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
+ madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+ lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+ do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
+ ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+ dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+ expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY);
+
+ /*
+ * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC. Should clear the
+ * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable
+ * again. Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug
+ * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE.
+ */
+ ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE);
+ pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+ ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC);
+ pkey_assert(!ret);
+ ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+ do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
+}
+
void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
{
int size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1327,6 +1370,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region,
test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
+ test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
test_ptrace_of_child,
test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,