From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>,
sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.sahrawat@samsung.com,
pankaj.m@samsung.com, v.narang@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: make sure to print log on console.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:49:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619094953.GB2631@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180619093244.ehj34uhpnpv6447f@pathway.suse.cz>
On (06/19/18 11:32), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > - if (suppress_message_printing(msg->level)) {
> > + if (!ignore_loglevel && (msg->flags & LOG_NOCONS)) {
> >
> >
> > `ignore_loglevel' is a module param and can change any time via
> > /sys/module/printk/parameters/ignore_loglevel
> > we need to respect its value.
>
> I would prefer to keep the patch as is. I see it the following way.
>
> Also console_loglevel can be changed anytime by /proc/sys/kernel/printk.
> The patch basically moves the decision about the message visibility from
> console_unlock() to vprintk_emit(). The logic is easier when all
> aspects are handled in a single location and only once.
But when I set /sys/module/printk/parameters/ignore_loglevel I naturally
expect it to take an immediate action. Without waiting for the consoles
to catch up and to discard N messages [if the consoles were behind the
logbuf head].
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20180601090029epcas5p3cc93d4bfbebb3199f0a2684058da7e26@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2018-06-01 8:56 ` [PATCH v2] printk: make sure to print log on console Maninder Singh
2018-06-08 8:39 ` Petr Mladek
2018-06-18 6:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-18 6:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-18 6:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-19 9:32 ` Petr Mladek
2018-06-19 9:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-06-19 10:52 ` Petr Mladek
2018-06-20 1:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-06-25 14:27 ` Petr Mladek
2018-06-19 13:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 10:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180619094953.GB2631@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=a.sahrawat@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
--cc=pankaj.m@samsung.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=v.narang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox