From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:11:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619161149.GA27423@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180619051327.149716-1-shakeelb@google.com>
Hi Shakeel,
this looks generally reasonable to me.
However, patch 1 introduces API that isn't used until patch 2 and 3,
which makes reviewing harder since you have to jump back and forth
between emails. Please fold patch 1 and introduce API along with the
users.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:13:24PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> This patchset introduces memcg variant memory allocation functions. The
> caller can explicitly pass the memcg to charge for kmem allocations.
> Currently the kernel, for __GFP_ACCOUNT memory allocation requests,
> extract the memcg of the current task to charge for the kmem allocation.
> This patch series introduces kmem allocation functions where the caller
> can pass the pointer to the remote memcg. The remote memcg will be
> charged for the allocation instead of the memcg of the caller. However
> the caller must have a reference to the remote memcg. This patch series
> also introduces scope API for targeted memcg charging. So, all the
> __GFP_ACCOUNT alloctions within the specified scope will be charged to
> the given target memcg.
Can you open with the rationale for the series, i.e. the problem
statement (fsnotify and bh memory footprint), *then* follow with the
proposed solution?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 5:13 [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 16:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 23:31 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-20 15:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 5:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: fsnotify: account fsnotify metadata to kmemcg Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 7:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-19 14:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 5:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs, mm: account buffer_head " Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 16:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 17:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-06-19 19:51 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 19:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-06-22 23:33 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-23 0:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: revert mem_cgroup_put() introduction Roman Gushchin
2018-06-23 0:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce mem_cgroup_put() helper Roman Gushchin
2018-06-23 0:10 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-23 0:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: revert mem_cgroup_put() introduction kbuild test robot
2018-06-19 16:11 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2018-06-19 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180619161149.GA27423@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox