From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@lge.com, joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] rcu: Do prepare and cleanup idle depending on in_nmi()
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:58:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180620145840.GR3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620093309.7d07715a@gandalf.local.home>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:33:09AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:47:19 +0900
> Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote:
>
> > Get rid of dependency on ->dynticks_nmi_nesting.
>
> This is not a trivial change. Can you please explain the rational and
> background in the change log. Add enough context here to know why this
> change is needed.
What Steve said!!!
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks!
>
> -- Steve
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index deb2508..59ae94e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -797,6 +797,11 @@ void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!in_nmi()) {
> > + rcu_prepare_for_idle();
> > + rcu_dynticks_task_enter();
> > + }
> > +
> > /* This NMI interrupted an RCU-idle CPU, restore RCU-idleness. */
> > trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Startirq"), rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0, rdtp->dynticks);
> > WRITE_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0); /* Avoid store tearing. */
> > @@ -824,14 +829,8 @@ void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
> > */
> > void rcu_irq_exit(void)
> > {
> > - struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > -
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > - if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 1)
> > - rcu_prepare_for_idle();
> > rcu_nmi_exit();
> > - if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 0)
> > - rcu_dynticks_task_enter();
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -944,6 +943,11 @@ void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
> > if (rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
> > rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit();
> > incby = 1;
> > +
> > + if (!in_nmi()) {
> > + rcu_dynticks_task_exit();
> > + rcu_cleanup_after_idle();
> > + }
> > }
> > trace_rcu_dyntick(incby == 1 ? TPS("Endirq") : TPS("++="),
> > rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting,
> > @@ -977,14 +981,8 @@ void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
> > */
> > void rcu_irq_enter(void)
> > {
> > - struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > -
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > - if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 0)
> > - rcu_dynticks_task_exit();
> > rcu_nmi_enter();
> > - if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 1)
> > - rcu_cleanup_after_idle();
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 8:47 [RFC 1/2] rcu: Do prepare and cleanup idle depending on in_nmi() Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 8:47 ` [RFC 2/2] rcu: Remove ->dynticks_nmi_nesting from struct rcu_dynticks Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 14:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 16:05 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 17:15 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 17:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-21 6:39 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-21 6:48 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-21 10:08 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-21 15:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-21 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 3:00 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-22 13:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 5:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-22 13:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 14:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 18:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-22 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22 20:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 8:28 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-25 16:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 17:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 19:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 20:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 20:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 20:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-25 22:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 23:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-25 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 23:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-25 21:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-22 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22 21:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 22:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-23 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28 20:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28 21:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 21:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-23 15:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-23 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-24 3:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-20 13:33 ` [RFC 1/2] rcu: Do prepare and cleanup idle depending on in_nmi() Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 14:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-06-20 15:25 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-20 16:11 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 16:37 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-20 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-20 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180620145840.GR3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox