From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE24C43141 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6546620874 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ov5zXsyr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6546620874 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754393AbeFUBnq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:43:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-f65.google.com ([209.85.160.65]:40981 "EHLO mail-pl0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754104AbeFUBnm (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:43:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-f65.google.com with SMTP id w8-v6so738409ply.8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VYl/U+nXEQuzfttS2PBaJ/SgcKFBBFEimfL7g7HdJ6E=; b=ov5zXsyrSvFUA82si3EhBS3sSvChHmgJ7swVXeghpsuAnTWJRT8YZH0aG2Z+E9ZSN8 OH6Xl3PrPsNQgCR2yvkAf4iOySmnn5y9ZIgrjyCrg/Ct+ALjNrs487l6oqQ4MO2/sYl1 KmLqsA4Wkf6OixjylO9WoxcqhKTLgFYH3ggv+yPYkG6YpY3PdOYRNRc0mAZVcMeQYB3n MOyVHmj+86gPvrIpFrThkomwlvRClUzhmqnZx5HkEYIO0ZFKW8d2Q41eoLOHnUxYzoiE yBjDEAglAG0R0bLDXV5JCNHo+7iMkXCnrSkS9Xqxsshpkfu/GoeQDErTJKhwkmdiRKh1 c6fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VYl/U+nXEQuzfttS2PBaJ/SgcKFBBFEimfL7g7HdJ6E=; b=hy5ocB7ND9IW0RE8iNOhsix2+zutREBC+S/psadW285BjIColeiZLvH2Y/1oYlIuPy pQARwTa1S5MIhVwZGaDSqlhcnh6lUXkC3GgVJJs2HHHv469uA/0iixbfJ1yXhm59+KPY OSlxjEpYGVlkCnDBPjjmMrRaZocmGcTgVIRp47/TSwhigH1EBUuKYM3YVwlclGxhSw+j 6Peh+Q5+VTTjXQa0gYXTibg/MLyGMCV/d80asaJcCAZ6SXyBRdK1SsvaSYVFdkHJgFtY 6vw7aPQ6mYkHmL3wdOxJkA/lwZl8sM826HoxS3sPWQEFYzUYTBZQNpPM3Xavv0hP2VM9 0vWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2Q2RZFrjYNhOcyn0XaquTYyJI2lQYsUQ/aolR7tUoybgdwUZ+J RRXW6NcfY0ypHocwUnDPF78= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKAAeBCyfq8RJRQ2/syKbyF2gkbT/M7bqleD8OwXlo5dwMKMsnD2sihMa4Z/tBnpBp8+XHUuA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9b92:: with SMTP id y18-v6mr25771880plp.57.1529545422214; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([39.7.59.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n85-v6sm5860567pfa.146.2018.06.20.18.43.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:43:37 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Hans de Goede Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Make CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_QUIET configurable Message-ID: <20180621014337.GD15462@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20180619115726.3098-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20180620110335.sjzmtra2z3chvon2@pathway.suse.cz> <20180620112436.GF444@jagdpanzerIV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (06/20/18 15:43), Hans de Goede wrote: > > I guess with my downstream hat on that we could live with silent, > but I would much prefer changing quiet, also so that we can lower > the firehose of mostly false-positive bugs coming in because of this. > Here is a short list from quick search which in no way is complete > (tip of the iceberg really): > > 1413342 - Linux 4.9.3: ACPI Error: [_OSI] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOU > 1415853 - ACPI Error: Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs- > 1514937 - ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND > 1527870 - ACPI Error: [\_SB_.PCI0.SAT1] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND > 1552580 - ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed > 1553320 - Kernel errors at bootup -- system runs okay > 1556967 - ACPI Error: [SMIC] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS > 1582825 - ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194687 > > If we change quiet to filter these out, all of these will go away, if > we add a new silent option then only fresh installs will get the > new silent option and the benefit will be much reduced. Hi, No real objections from my side, I guess. Especially given that Red Hat, VMWare and SUSE like your patch :) -ss