From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Refactor rcu_{nmi,irq}_{enter,exit}()
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:23:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180622062351.GC17010@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529647926-24427-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:12:06PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> When passing through irq or NMI contexts, the current code uses
> ->dynticks_nmi_nesting to detect if it's in the ourmost at the moment.
>
> Here, the thing is that all the related functions, rcu_irq_enter(),
> rcu_nmi_enter(), rcu_irq_exit() and rcu_nmi_exit() are carrying out
> the check within each under the following call relationship so there
> must be redundant conditional branches:
>
> rcu_irq_enter()
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
> rcu_nmi_enter()
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
^
Precisely, ->dynticks
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
>
> rcu_irq_exit()
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
> rcu_nmi_exit()
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
>
> rcu_nmi_enter()
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
^
Precisely, ->dynticks
>
> rcu_nmi_exit()
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
>
> In order to make the code more readable and remove redundant
> conditional branches, we need to refactor rcu_{nmi,irq}_{enter,exit}()
> so they use a common function for each like:
>
> rcu_irq_enter() inlining rcu_nmi_enter_common(irq)
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
^
Precisely, ->dynticks
>
> rcu_irq_exit() inlining rcu_nmi_exit_common(irq)
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
>
> rcu_nmi_enter() inlining rcu_nmi_enter_common(nmi)
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
^
Precisely, ->dynticks
>
> rcu_nmi_exit() inlining rcu_nmi_exit_common(nmi)
> /* A conditional branch with ->dynticks_nmi_nesting */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-22 6:12 [PATCH] rcu: Refactor rcu_{nmi,irq}_{enter,exit}() Byungchul Park
2018-06-22 6:23 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2018-06-23 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 8:21 ` Byungchul Park
2018-06-25 14:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-25 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-22 8:34 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-22 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180622062351.GC17010@X58A-UD3R \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox