From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] x86/mce: Always use 64-bit timestamps
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 11:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180622095428.626-2-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180622095428.626-1-bp@alien8.de>
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The machine check timestamp uses get_seconds(), which returns an
'unsigned long' number that might overflow on 32-bit architectures (in
the distant future) and is therefore deprecated.
The normal replacement would be ktime_get_real_seconds(), but that needs
to use a sequence lock that might cause a deadlock if the MCE happens at
just the wrong moment. The __ktime_get_real_seconds() skips that lock
and is safer here, but has a miniscule risk of returning the wrong time
when we read it on a 32-bit architecture at the same time as updating
the epoch, i.e. from before y2106 overflow time to after, or vice versa.
This seems to be an acceptable risk in this particular case, and is the
same thing we do in kdb.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: y2038@lists.linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180618100759.1921750-1-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index e4cf6ff1c2e1..b887415652ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ void mce_setup(struct mce *m)
{
memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mce));
m->cpu = m->extcpu = smp_processor_id();
- /* We hope get_seconds stays lockless */
- m->time = get_seconds();
+ /* need the internal __ version to avoid deadlocks */
+ m->time = __ktime_get_real_seconds();
m->cpuvendor = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
m->cpuid = cpuid_eax(1);
m->socketid = cpu_data(m->extcpu).phys_proc_id;
--
2.17.0.582.gccdcbd54c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-22 9:54 [PATCH 0/7] RAS queue Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 9:54 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-06-22 9:54 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/mce: Fix incorrect "Machine check from unknown source" message Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/mce: Carve out the crashing_cpu check Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 12:41 ` [tip:ras/core] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 9:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/mce: Remove !banks check Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 12:41 ` [tip:ras/core] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 9:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/mce: Carve out bank scanning code Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 12:42 ` [tip:ras/core] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 9:54 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/mce: Cleanup __mc_scan_banks() Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 12:42 ` [tip:ras/core] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 9:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/mce: Do not overwrite MCi_STATUS in mce_no_way_out() Borislav Petkov
2018-06-22 12:39 ` [tip:ras/core] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180622095428.626-2-bp@alien8.de \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox