From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, knaack.h@gmx.de,
pmeerw@pmeerw.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging:iio:accel:adis16240: sign extend function replace hard code duplication
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 14:32:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180624143208.7686711d@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180618174450.3399-1-karim.eshapa@gmail.com>
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 19:44:50 +0200
Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Use sign_extend32 kernel function instead of code duplication,
> Safe also for 16 bit. and remove declaration of bits variable not needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c | 11 ++---------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> index fff6d99089cc..24e525f1ef25 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ static int adis16240_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> {
> struct adis *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> int ret;
> - int bits;
> u8 addr;
> s16 val16;
>
> @@ -287,24 +286,18 @@ static int adis16240_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> *val = 25000 / 244 - 0x133; /* 25 C = 0x133 */
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
> - bits = 10;
> addr = adis16240_addresses[chan->scan_index][0];
> ret = adis_read_reg_16(st, addr, &val16);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - val16 &= (1 << bits) - 1;
> - val16 = (s16)(val16 << (16 - bits)) >> (16 - bits);
> - *val = val16;
> + *val = sign_extend32(val16, 9);
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PEAK:
> - bits = 10;
> addr = adis16240_addresses[chan->scan_index][1];
> ret = adis_read_reg_16(st, addr, &val16);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - val16 &= (1 << bits) - 1;
> - val16 = (s16)(val16 << (16 - bits)) >> (16 - bits);
> - *val = val16;
> + *val = sign_extend32(val16, 9);
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> return -EINVAL;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-24 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 17:44 [PATCH v3] staging:iio:accel:adis16240: sign extend function replace hard code duplication Karim Eshapa
2018-06-24 13:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180624143208.7686711d@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=karim.eshapa@gmail.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox