From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make it stop complaining about docbook function-header comment
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 08:39:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180625153958.GO3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529908015-7256-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:26:55PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Running "make htmldocs" complains about the docbook function-header
> comment. It wants the "irq" parameter described which wasn't done by
> a commit 5e5ea52645b197 (rcu: Refactor rcu_{nmi,irq}_{enter,exit}()).
> So add its description of the parameter to the comment.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Very good, I will squash this into your previous patch, adding to the
commit log as suggested by Steven Rostedt.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 4ed74f1..6c5a7f0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ void rcu_user_enter(void)
>
> /**
> * rcu_nmi_exit_common - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
> + * @irq: Is this call from rcu_irq_exit?
> *
> * If we are returning from the outermost NMI handler that interrupted an
> * RCU-idle period, update rdtp->dynticks and rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting
> @@ -933,6 +934,7 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
>
> /**
> * rcu_nmi_enter_common - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
> + * @irq: Is this call from rcu_irq_enter?
> *
> * If the CPU was idle from RCU's viewpoint, update rdtp->dynticks and
> * rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting to let the RCU grace-period handling know
> --
> 1.9.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 6:26 [PATCH] rcu: Make it stop complaining about docbook function-header comment Byungchul Park
2018-06-25 15:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180625153958.GO3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox