From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Erick Reyes <erickreyes@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:21:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180625162102.GA49367@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625221302.8507c98e500d8efc70c19d88@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:13:02PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:32:36 -0700
> Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/preemptirq/irqsoff_tracer.tc
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# description: test for the preemptirqsoff tracer
> > +
> > +MOD=test_atomic_sections
> > +
> > +fail() {
> > + reset_tracer
> > + rmmod $MOD || true
> > + exit_fail
> > +}
> > +
> > +unsup() { #msg
> > + reset_tracer
> > + rmmod $MOD || true
> > + echo $1
> > + exit_unsupported
> > +}
> > +
> > +modprobe $MOD || unsup "$MOD module not available"
> > +rmmod $MOD
> > +
> > +grep -q "preemptoff" available_tracers || unsup "preemptoff tracer not enabled"
> > +grep -q "irqsoff" available_tracers || unsup "irqsoff tracer not enabled"
> > +
> > +reset_tracer
> > +
> > +# Simulate preemptoff section for half a second couple of times
> > +echo preemptoff > current_tracer
> > +sleep 1
> > +modprobe test_atomic_sections atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000 || fail
> > +rmmod test_atomic_sections || fail
> > +modprobe test_atomic_sections atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000 || fail
> > +rmmod test_atomic_sections || fail
> > +modprobe test_atomic_sections atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000 || fail
> > +rmmod test_atomic_sections || fail
>
> Why don't you use $MOD for these operations?
Yes, I will. Thanks for the suggestion.
> > +
> > +cat trace
> > +
> > +# Confirm which tracer
> > +grep -q "tracer: preemptoff" trace || fail
> > +
> > +# Check the end of the section
> > +egrep -q "5.....us : <stack trace>" trace || fail
> > +
> > +# Check for 500ms of latency
> > +egrep -q "latency: 5..... us" trace || fail
> > +
> > +reset_tracer
> > +
> > +# Simulate irqsoff section for half a second couple of times
> > +echo irqsoff > current_tracer
> > +sleep 1
> > +modprobe test_atomic_sections atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000 || fail
> > +rmmod test_atomic_sections || fail
> > +modprobe test_atomic_sections atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000 || fail
> > +rmmod test_atomic_sections || fail
> > +modprobe test_atomic_sections atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000 || fail
> > +rmmod test_atomic_sections || fail
>
> Ditto.
Done.
> Other parts looks good to me.
Cool, updated this patch below as "v9.1" ;-)
thanks!
- Joel
---8<-----------------
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH v9.1 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff
tracers
Here we add unit tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracer by using a
kernel module introduced previously to trigger atomic sections in the
kernel.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/config | 3 +
.../test.d/preemptirq/irqsoff_tracer.tc | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/preemptirq/irqsoff_tracer.tc
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/config b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/config
index b01924c71c09..29588b328345 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/config
@@ -4,3 +4,6 @@ CONFIG_FUNCTION_PROFILER=y
CONFIG_TRACER_SNAPSHOT=y
CONFIG_STACK_TRACER=y
CONFIG_HIST_TRIGGERS=y
+CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER=y
+CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER=y
+CONFIG_TEST_ATOMIC_SECTIONS=m
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/preemptirq/irqsoff_tracer.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/preemptirq/irqsoff_tracer.tc
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..2dcd5e4cafb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/preemptirq/irqsoff_tracer.tc
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# description: test for the preemptirqsoff tracer
+
+MOD=test_atomic_sections
+
+fail() {
+ reset_tracer
+ rmmod $MOD || true
+ exit_fail
+}
+
+unsup() { #msg
+ reset_tracer
+ rmmod $MOD || true
+ echo $1
+ exit_unsupported
+}
+
+modprobe $MOD || unsup "$MOD module not available"
+rmmod $MOD
+
+grep -q "preemptoff" available_tracers || unsup "preemptoff tracer not enabled"
+grep -q "irqsoff" available_tracers || unsup "irqsoff tracer not enabled"
+
+reset_tracer
+
+# Simulate preemptoff section for half a second couple of times
+echo preemptoff > current_tracer
+sleep 1
+modprobe $MOD atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000 || fail
+rmmod $MOD || fail
+modprobe $MOD atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000 || fail
+rmmod $MOD || fail
+modprobe $MOD atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000 || fail
+rmmod $MOD || fail
+
+cat trace
+
+# Confirm which tracer
+grep -q "tracer: preemptoff" trace || fail
+
+# Check the end of the section
+egrep -q "5.....us : <stack trace>" trace || fail
+
+# Check for 500ms of latency
+egrep -q "latency: 5..... us" trace || fail
+
+reset_tracer
+
+# Simulate irqsoff section for half a second couple of times
+echo irqsoff > current_tracer
+sleep 1
+modprobe $MOD atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000 || fail
+rmmod $MOD || fail
+modprobe $MOD atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000 || fail
+rmmod $MOD || fail
+modprobe $MOD atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000 || fail
+rmmod $MOD || fail
+
+cat trace
+
+# Confirm which tracer
+grep -q "tracer: irqsoff" trace || fail
+
+# Check the end of the section
+egrep -q "5.....us : <stack trace>" trace || fail
+
+# Check for 500ms of latency
+egrep -q "latency: 5..... us" trace || fail
+
+reset_tracer
+exit 0
+
--
2.18.0.rc2.346.g013aa6912e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 22:32 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] srcu: Add notrace variants of srcu_read_{lock,unlock} Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] srcu: Add notrace variant of srcu_dereference Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] trace/irqsoff: Split reset into separate functions Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-25 13:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-25 16:21 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2018-06-27 12:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-28 18:21 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 0:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 5:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180625162102.GA49367@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=erickreyes@google.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox