From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: Make expedited GPs handle CPU 0 being offline
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:38:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180626093820.GG2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625224332.10596-2-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:43:32PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> + preempt_disable();
> + for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
> + if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) /* Preemption disabled. */
> + continue;
Create for_each_node_online_cpu() instead? Seems a bit pointless to
iterate possible mask only to then check it against the online mask.
Just iterate the online mask directly.
Or better yet, write this as:
preempt_disable();
cpu = cpumask_next(rnp->grplo - 1, cpu_online_mask);
if (cpu > rnp->grphi)
cpu = WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
queue_work_on(cpu, rcu_par_gp_wq, &rnp->rew.rew_work);
preempt_enable();
Which is what it appears to be doing.
> + queue_work_on(cpu, rcu_par_gp_wq, &rnp->rew.rew_work);
> + rnp->exp_need_flush = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + preempt_enable();
> + if (!rnp->exp_need_flush) { /* All offline, report QSes. */
> + queue_work(rcu_par_gp_wq, &rnp->rew.rew_work);
> + rnp->exp_need_flush = true;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Wait for workqueue jobs (if any) to complete. */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 22:43 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] Expedited grace-period changes for v4.19 Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 22:43 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Make expedited grace period use direct call on last leaf Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-25 22:43 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: Make expedited GPs handle CPU 0 being offline Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-06-26 10:44 ` Boqun Feng
2018-06-26 11:46 ` Boqun Feng
2018-06-26 12:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 19:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-27 2:42 ` Boqun Feng
2018-06-27 16:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180626093820.GG2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox