From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/27] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:42:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628174240.GM3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628051028.GB79165@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:10:28PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:27:26AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> [..]
> > > > > s = __ALIGN_MASK(s, RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK);
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree with Peter's suggestions for both the verbiage reduction in the
> > > > comments in the header, as the new code he is proposing is more
> > > > self-documenting. I believe I proposed a big comment just because the code
> > > > wasn't self-documenting or obvious previously so needed an explanation.
> > > >
> > > > How would you like to proceed? Let me know what you guys decide, I am really
> > > > Ok with anything. If you guys agree, should I write a follow-up patch with
> > > > Peter's suggestion that applies on top of this one? Or do we want to drop
> > > > this one in favor of Peter's suggestion?
> > >
> > > Shortening the comment would be good, so please do that.
>
> Paul,
>
> Do you want to fold the below patch into the original one? Or do you prefer I
> resent the original patch fixed up?
>
> Following is the patch ontop of current 'dev' branch in your tree, with the
> excessive comments removed.
>
> Thanks to Peter for suggesting!
I merged this into the current commit, with the result shown below.
Thank you both!
Thanx, Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
commit c9a6ed70aad9f4571afba3e12e869f5fccc26a40
Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Tue May 22 23:38:13 2018 -0700
rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works
rcu_seq_snap may be tricky to decipher. Lets document how it works with
an example to make it easier.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Shrink comment as suggested by Peter Zijlstra. ]
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index aa215d6355f8..89f13fffac73 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -91,7 +91,17 @@ static inline void rcu_seq_end(unsigned long *sp)
WRITE_ONCE(*sp, rcu_seq_endval(sp));
}
-/* Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number. */
+/*
+ * rcu_seq_snap - Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number.
+ *
+ * This function returns the earliest value of the grace-period sequence number
+ * that will indicate that a full grace period has elapsed since the current
+ * time. Once the grace-period sequence number has reached this value, it will
+ * be safe to invoke all callbacks that have been registered prior to the
+ * current time. This value is the current grace-period number plus two to the
+ * power of the number of low-order bits reserved for state, then rounded up to
+ * the next value in which the state bits are all zero.
+ */
static inline unsigned long rcu_seq_snap(unsigned long *sp)
{
unsigned long s;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-26 0:34 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/27] Post-gp_seq miscellaneous fixes for v4.19 Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/27] rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() static Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/27] rcu: Improve rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() reporting Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/27] rcu: rcupdate.h: Get rid of Sphinx warnings at rcu_pointer_handoff() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/27] rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging output Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/27] rcu: Improve RCU-tasks naming and comments Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/27] rcu: Mark task as .need_qs less aggressively Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 21:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/27] rcu: Inline rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() into its sole caller Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/27] rcu: Clarify and correct the rcu_preempt_qs() header comment Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/27] rcu: Remove unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu() function Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/27] rcu: Remove unused local variable "cpu" Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from panic_on_rcu_stall() and rcu_blocking_is_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_torture_print_module_parms() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_perf_print_module_parms() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/27] rcu: Remove __maybe_unused from rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/27] rcu: Use RCU CPU stall timeout for rcu_check_gp_start_stall() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/27] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 17:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 19:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 20:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 22:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 18:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 19:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-27 4:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-27 17:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-27 18:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-27 19:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-28 5:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/27] rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/27] rcu: Add comment to the last sleep in the rcu tasks loop Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/27] rcu: Add diagnostics for rcutorture writer stall warning Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/27] rcu: Check the range of jiffies_till_{first,next}_fqs when setting them Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/27] doc: Update synchronize_rcu() definition in whatisRCU.txt Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/27] rcu: Make rcu_seq_diff() more exact Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/27] MAINTAINERS: Update RCU, SRCU, and TORTURE-TEST entries Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/27] rcu: Print stall-warning NMI dyntick state in hexadecimal Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/27] srcu: Add grace-period number to rcutorture statistics printout Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/27] rculist: Improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-26 0:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/27] rcu: Assign higher prio to RCU threads if rcutorture is built-in Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180628174240.GM3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox