From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@microchip.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@outlook.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>, Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/32] mtd: rawnand: add hooks that may be called during nand_scan()
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:09:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704090942.24a17db1@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180703220029.19565-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Hi Miquel,
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:59:58 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> In order to remove the limitation that forbids dynamic allocation in
> nand_scan_ident(), we must create a path that will be the same for all
> controller drivers. The idea is to use nand_scan() instead of the widely
> implemented nand_scan_ident()/nand_scan_tail() couple. In order to
> achieve this, controller drivers will need to adjust some parameters
> between these two functions depending on the NAND chip wired on them.
>
> For that, a hook called ->attach_chip() is created in the
> nand_hw_control structure. This structure may be referenced by two ways:
> 1/ if the driver does not implement its own controller, the
> chip->controller hook is not populated before nand_scan() so it
> cannot be dereferenced: use chip->hwcontrol instead (which is
> statically allocated and will be referenced later by chip->controller
> anyway).
> 2/ through chip->controller if the driver implements its own controller.
>
> Another hook, ->detach_chip() is also introduced in order to clean the
> controller driver's potential allocations in case of failure of
> nand_scan_tail(). There is no need for the controller driver to call the
> ->detach_chip() hook directly upon error after a successful nand_scan().
> In this situation, calling nand_release() as before is enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index faac82b1e058..97a74d48b0cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -6712,11 +6712,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail);
> int nand_scan_with_ids(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips,
> struct nand_flash_dev *ids)
> {
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> int ret;
>
> ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, maxchips, ids);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (chip->controller->attach_chip) {
> + ret = chip->controller->attach_chip(chip);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> + if (ret && chip->controller->detach_chip)
> + chip->controller->detach_chip(chip);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_with_ids);
> @@ -6744,7 +6756,12 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
>
> /* Free manufacturer priv data. */
> nand_manufacturer_cleanup(chip);
> +
> + /* Free controller specific allocations after chip identification */
> + if (chip->controller->detach_chip)
> + chip->controller->detach_chip(chip);
> }
> +
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_cleanup);
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> index 0c6fb316b409..81654211e520 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> @@ -517,11 +517,17 @@ struct nand_id {
> * @wq: wait queue to sleep on if a NAND operation is in
> * progress used instead of the per chip wait queue
> * when a hw controller is available.
> + * @attach_chip: Callback that may be called between nand_detect() and
> + * nand_scan_tail() during nand_scan() (optional).
> + * @detach_chip: Callback that may be called if nand_scan_tail() fails
> + * (optional).
> */
> struct nand_hw_control {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct nand_chip *active;
> wait_queue_head_t wq;
> + int (*attach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip);
> + void (*detach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip);
> };
Can we instead declare a nand_controller_ops struct and then have
nand_hw_control point to it. Something like:
struct nand_controller_ops {
int (*attach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip);
void (*detach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip);
};
struct nand_hw_control {
...
const struct nand_controller_ops *ops;
};
>
> static inline void nand_hw_control_init(struct nand_hw_control *nfc)
Regards,
Boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-03 21:59 [PATCH v2 00/32] Allow dynamic allocations during NAND chip identification phase Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/32] mtd: rawnand: add hooks that may be called during nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-04 7:09 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-07-03 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/32] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-04 7:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/32] mtd: rawnand: cafe: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/32] mtd: rawnand: davinci: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/32] mtd: rawnand: denali: convert " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/32] mtd: rawnand: fsl_elbc: convert driver " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/32] mtd: rawnand: fsl_ifc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/32] mtd: rawnand: fsmc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/32] mtd: rawnand: gpmi: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/32] mtd: rawnand: hisi504: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/32] mtd: rawnand: jz4780: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/32] mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_mlc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/32] mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_slc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/32] mtd: rawnand: marvell: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/32] mtd: rawnand: mtk: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/32] mtd: rawnand: mxc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/32] mtd: rawnand: nandsim: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/32] mtd: rawnand: omap2: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 19/32] mtd: rawnand: s3c2410: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/32] mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: move all NAND chip related setup in one function Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/32] mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/32] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/32] mtd: rawnand: tango: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/32] mtd: rawnand: txx9ndfmc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 25/32] mtd: rawnand: vf610: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 26/32] mtd: rawnand: atmel: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 27/32] mtd: rawnand: sm_common: convert driver to nand_scan_with_ids() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 28/32] mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 29/32] mtd: rawnand: qcom: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 30/32] mtd: rawnand: jz4740: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 31/32] mtd: rawnand: do not export nand_scan_[ident|tail]() anymore Miquel Raynal
2018-07-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 32/32] mtd: rawnand: allocate dynamically ONFI parameters during detection Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180704090942.24a17db1@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=rainyfeeling@outlook.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=wenyou.yang@microchip.com \
--cc=xiaolei.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox