Re: [PATCH 5/7] proc/kcore: clean up ELF header generation

[Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>]

On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 06:05:17PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Omar,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc3 next-20180706]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Omar-Sandoval/proc-kcore-improvements/20180707-052548
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
>         make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> 
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> 
>    include/linux/nodemask.h:265:16: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
>    include/linux/nodemask.h:271:16: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
> >> fs//proc/kcore.c:328:23: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
> >> fs//proc/kcore.c:328:23: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)

Not sure why this confuses sparse. Maybe because it's #define elfhdr
elf64_hdr.

>    fs//proc/kcore.c:368:23: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
>    fs//proc/kcore.c:368:23: sparse: expression using sizeof(void)
> >> fs//proc/kcore.c:384:49: sparse: missing braces around initializer

This is

>  > 384			struct elf_prstatus prstatus = {0};

GCC doesn't complain, but I guess I can change it to "= {};", which
isn't strict C89 but both GCC and sparse are happy with.