Re: [PATCH V2] MIPS: implement smp_cond_load_acquire() for Loongson-3

陈华才
2018-07-10T11:52:51Z

Hi, Peter,

I'm afraid that you have missing something......

Firstly, our previous conclusion (READ_ONCE need a barrier to avoid 'reads prioritised over writes') is totally wrong. So define cpu_relax() to smp_mb() like ARM11MPCore is incorrect, even if it can 'solve' Loongson's problem.
Secondly, I think the real problem is like this:
1, CPU0 set the lock to 0, then do something;
2, While CPU0 is doing something, CPU1 set the flag to 1 with WRITE_ONCE(), and then wait the lock become to 1 with a READ_ONCE() loop;
3, After CPU0 complete its work, it wait the flag become to 1, and if so then set the lock to 1;
4, If the lock becomes to 1, CPU1 will leave the READ_ONCE() loop.
If without SFB, everything is OK. But with SFB in step 2, a READ_ONCE() loop is right after WRITE_ONCE(), which makes the flag cached in SFB (so be invisible by other CPUs) for ever, then both CPU0 and CPU1 wait for ever.

I don't think this is a hardware bug, in design, SFB will flushed to L1 cache in three cases:
1, data in SFB is full (be a complete cache line);
2, there is a subsequent read access in the same cache line;
3, a 'sync' instruction is executed.

In this case, there is no other memory access (read or write) between WRITE_ONCE() and READ_ONCE() loop. So Case 1 and Case 2 will not happen, and the only way to make the flag be visible is wbflush (wbflush is sync in Loongson's case).

I think this problem is not only happens on Loongson, but will happen on other CPUs which have write buffer (unless the write buffer has a 4th case to be flushed).

Huacai

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Peter Zijlstra"<peterz@infradead.org>;
Date: Tue, Jul 10, 2018 06:54 PM
To: "Huacai Chen"<chenhc@lemote.com>;
Cc: "Paul Burton"<paul.burton@mips.com>; "Ralf Baechle"<ralf@linux-mips.org>; "James Hogan"<jhogan@kernel.org>; "linux-mips"<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>; "Fuxin Zhang"<zhangfx@lemote.com>; "wuzhangjin"<wuzhangjin@gmail.com>; "stable"<stable@vger.kernel.org>; "Alan Stern"<stern@rowland.harvard.edu>; "Andrea Parri"<andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>; "Will Deacon"<will.deacon@arm.com>; "Boqun Feng"<boqun.feng@gmail.com>; "Nicholas Piggin"<npiggin@gmail.com>; "David Howells"<dhowells@redhat.com>; "Jade Alglave"<j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>; "Luc Maranget"<luc.maranget@inria.fr>; "Paul E. McKenney"<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; "Akira Yokosawa"<akiyks@gmail.com>; "LKML"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MIPS: implement smp_cond_load_acquire() for Loongson-3

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:36:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> So now explain why the cpu_relax() hack that arm did doesn't work for
> you?

So below is the patch I think you want; if not explain in detail how
this is wrong.

diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h
index af34afbc32d9..e59773de6528 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -386,7 +386,17 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p);
#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->regs[29])
#define KSTK_STATUS(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->cp0_status)

+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LOONGSON3
+/*
+ * Loongson-3 has a CPU bug where the store buffer gets starved when stuck in a
+ * read loop. Since spin loops of any kind should have a cpu_relax() in them,
+ * force a store-buffer flush from cpu_relax() such that any pending writes
+ * will become available as expected.
+ */
+#define cpu_relax() smp_mb()
+#else
#define cpu_relax() barrier()
+#endif

/*
* Return_address is a replacement for __builtin_return_address(count)