public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/tracing: Move taking of spin lock out of trace event handlers
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:49:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711174940.GH72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180709174854.74a30b57@gandalf.local.home>

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:48:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> It is unwise to take spin locks from the handlers of trace events.
> Mainly, because they can introduce lockups, because it introduces locks
> in places that are normally not tested. Worse yet, because trace events
> are tucked away in the include/trace/events/ directory, locks that are
> taken there are forgotten about.
> 
> As a general rule, I tell people never to take any locks in a trace
> event handler.
> 
> Several cgroup trace event handlers call cgroup_path() which eventually
> takes the kernfs_rename_lock spinlock. This injects the spinlock in the
> code without people realizing it. It also can cause issues for the
> PREEMPT_RT patch, as the spinlock becomes a mutex, and the trace event
> handlers are called with preemption disabled.
> 
> By moving the calculation of the cgroup_path() out of the trace event
> handlers and into a macro (surrounded by a
> trace_cgroup_##type##_enabled()), then we could place the cgroup_path
> into a string, and pass that to the trace event. Not only does this
> remove the taking of the spinlock out of the trace event handler, but
> it also means that the cgroup_path() only needs to be called once (it
> is currently called twice, once to get the length to reserver the
> buffer for, and once again to get the path itself. Now it only needs to
> be done once.
> 
> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Applied to cgroup/for-4.19.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-09 21:48 [PATCH] cgroup/tracing: Move taking of spin lock out of trace event handlers Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 16:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-11 17:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180711174940.GH72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox