From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Reber <adrian@lisas.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: remove EXPERT from CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:16:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180714201610.GB17877@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871sc5vc7n.fsf@xmission.com>
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 02:39:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> For a config option that no one has come forward with an actual real
> >> world use case for disabling, that cost seems much too high.
> >
> > The real-world use case is precisely as stated: code size, both storage
> > and RAM.
>
> That is theoretical.
No, it isn't. I've *watched* the kernel's size trend steadily upward
over time. And it largely happens in individual features that don't
think *their* contribution to size is all that large.
> > I regularly encounter systems I'd *like* to put Linux in that have
> > around 1MB of storage and 1MB of RAM, or even less.
>
> Yes. There is so little code behind CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTART that it
> won't help with that.
It adds up; there are hundreds more small features like it.
> But if minification is the actual requirement for disabling
> CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTART than CONFIG_CHECKPIONT_RESTART is properly
> behind expert and it needs to be default y instead of default n.
I don't have any objection to *that*, as long as the option remains.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-14 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 13:07 [PATCH] kconfig: remove EXPERT from CHECKPOINT_RESTORE Adrian Reber
2018-07-12 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-12 13:47 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2018-07-12 13:51 ` Alice Frosi
2018-07-12 16:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-07-13 8:35 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2018-07-13 13:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-07-13 14:20 ` Adrian Reber
2018-07-13 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-14 4:44 ` Kees Cook
2018-07-14 6:02 ` Josh Triplett
2018-07-14 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-07-14 19:10 ` Josh Triplett
2018-07-14 19:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-07-14 20:16 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2018-07-14 20:19 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2018-07-13 8:23 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180714201610.GB17877@localhost \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=adrian@lisas.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox