From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework NVMe abort handling
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:42:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719134203.GA15212@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180719132838.15556-1-jthumshirn@suse.de>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 03:28:34PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> PCI currently is the only transport we have which is doing more than
> queueing a transport reset but trying to abort the command first.
>
> This series brings the other transports we currently have up to the
> same level.
Without even looking at the code yet: why? The nvme abort isn't
very useful, and due to the lack of ordering between different
queues almost harmful on fabrics. What problem do you try to
solve?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-19 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 13:28 [PATCH 0/4] Rework NVMe abort handling Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: factor out pci abort handling into core Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 16:29 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-19 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: rdma: abort commands before resetting controller Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 13:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvmet: loop: " Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 13:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: fc: " Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-07-19 14:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] Rework NVMe abort handling Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 14:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-19 14:35 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 14:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-19 14:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 15:04 ` James Smart
2018-07-20 6:36 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-19 15:00 ` James Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180719134203.GA15212@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox