Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Cleanups and optimizations

Miquel Raynal
2018-09-19T08:46:55Z

Hi Janusz,

Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote on Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:45:24
-0700:

> Hi,
>
> * Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com> [180905 20:56]:
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:47:57 AM CEST Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Patch 2/3 does not apply on nand/next. Indeed the driver does not look
> > > the same as in the diff.
> >
> > That's because I built it on top of my former series from the mid of July,
> > containing "[PATCH v2 2/3 v4] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO lookup table".
> > It was acked by you, Miquel, and supposed to be merged via linux-omap tree.
>
> Hmm I thought the plan was for dependencies to clear and then
> merge the rest via various driver trees.. Or at least I don't have
> the patch above tagged anywhere for me to merge. Then again, I
> try to forget everything posted before -rc1 just to stay sane :)
>
> > > I don't see any changes on my side that could
> > > explain this so perhaps you could rebase on top of 4.19-rc2 (or
> > > nand/next, as you wish) and resend the series?
> >
> > As far as I can see, Tony hasn't applied that series yet, so maybe I can still
> > move that patch out of there and insert it into this series in front of the
> > other 3 patches and resend. That would however make patch 3/3 of that old
> > series depend on this one.
> >
> > Tony, what do you think?
>
> Yes please resend based on v4.19-rc1 or MTD next. If there
> are still pending dependencies, please let us know and we can
> set up an immutable branch against v4.19-rc1 with those for
> MTD and me to merge in as needed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony

AFAIR I didn't received any new patches from you since Tony suggestion.
If you haven't done it already, please rebase against nand/next before
sending patches (internal API changed a bit, it might be worth fixing
the conflicts before sending them).

Thanks,
Miquèl