From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Anton Vasilyev <vasilyev@ispras.ru>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: vpd: Fix section enabled flag on vpd_section_destroy
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:23:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180723172305.GD100814@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723171336.GA15900@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:13:36AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 07:48:57PM +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> > static struct ro_vpd and rw_vpd are initialized by vpd_sections_init()
> > in vpd_probe() based on header's ro and rw sizes.
> > In vpd_remove() vpd_section_destroy() performs deinitialization based
> > on enabled flag, which is set to true by vpd_sections_init().
> > This leads to call of vpd_section_destroy() on already destroyed section
> > for probe-release-probe-release sequence if first probe performs
> > ro_vpd initialization and second probe does not initialize it.
> >
>
> I am not sure if the situation described can be seen in the first place.
> The second probe would only not perform ro_vpd initialization if it fails
> prior to that, ie if it fails to allocate memory or if there is a
> consistency problem. In that case the remove function would not be called.
>
> However, there is a problem in the code: A partially failed probe will
> leave the system in inconsistent state. Example: ro section initializes,
> rw section fails to initialize. The probe will fail, but the ro section
> will not be destroyed, its sysfs attributes still exist, and its memory
> is still mapped. It would make more sense to fix _that_ problem.
> Essentially, vpd_sections_init() should clean up after itself after it
> fails to initialize a section.
>
> Note that I am not convinced that the "enabled" flag is needed in the first
> place. It is only relevant if vpd_section_destroy() is called, which only
> happens from the remove function. The remove function is only called if the
> probe function succeeded. In that case it is always set for both sections.
The problem will happen if coreboot memory changes between 2 probes so
that header.ro_size is not 0 on the first pass and is 0 on the second
pass. Not quite likely to ever happen in real life, but resetting a flag
is pretty cheap to not do it.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-23 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 16:48 [PATCH] firmware: vpd: Fix section enabled flag on vpd_section_destroy Anton Vasilyev
2018-07-23 17:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-07-23 17:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-07-23 17:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2018-07-23 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-07-23 18:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-07-24 15:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vasilyev
2018-07-24 15:55 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180723172305.GD100814@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=bianpan2016@163.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=vasilyev@ispras.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox