From: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: drop unneeded bitmap_zero() in util/header.c
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 23:26:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724200356.GA22741@yury-thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180623073502.16321-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 10:35:01AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> On top of next-20180622.
>
> bitmap_zero() is called after bitmap_alloc() in perf code. But
> bitmap_alloc() internally uses calloc() which guarantees that allocated
> area is zeroed. So following bitmap_zero is unneeded. Drop it.
>
> This happened because of confusing name for bitmap allocator. It
> should has name bitmap_zalloc instead of bitmap_alloc. This series:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/18/841
> introduces new API for bitmap allocations in kernel, and functions
> there are named correctly. Following patch propogates the API to tools,
> and fixes naming issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Ping?
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c | 2 --
> tools/perf/tests/mem2node.c | 5 +----
> tools/perf/util/header.c | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c b/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c
> index 47bedf25ba69..96e7fc1ad3f9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c
> @@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ static unsigned long *get_bitmap(const char *str, int nbits)
> bm = bitmap_alloc(nbits);
>
> if (map && bm) {
> - bitmap_zero(bm, nbits);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++)
> set_bit(map->map[i], bm);
> }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/mem2node.c b/tools/perf/tests/mem2node.c
> index 0c3c87f86e03..d8e3d49d3638 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/mem2node.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/mem2node.c
> @@ -24,11 +24,8 @@ static unsigned long *get_bitmap(const char *str, int nbits)
> bm = bitmap_alloc(nbits);
>
> if (map && bm) {
> - bitmap_zero(bm, nbits);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++)
> set_bit(map->map[i], bm);
> - }
> }
>
> if (map)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index 540cd2dcd3e7..3a6bec22baa3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -279,8 +279,6 @@ static int do_read_bitmap(struct feat_fd *ff, unsigned long **pset, u64 *psize)
> if (!set)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - bitmap_zero(set, size);
> -
> p = (u64 *) set;
>
> for (i = 0; (u64) i < BITS_TO_U64(size); i++) {
> @@ -1285,7 +1283,6 @@ static int memory_node__read(struct memory_node *n, unsigned long idx)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - bitmap_zero(n->set, size);
> n->node = idx;
> n->size = size;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-23 7:35 [PATCH 1/2] perf: drop unneeded bitmap_zero() in util/header.c Yury Norov
2018-06-23 7:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] bitmap: sync tools with new bitmap allocation API Yury Norov
2018-06-24 21:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-06-24 22:45 ` Yury Norov
2018-07-04 15:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-07-04 17:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-06-25 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-07-04 17:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-07-04 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Yury Norov
2018-07-25 11:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-07-24 20:26 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2018-07-25 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: drop unneeded bitmap_zero() in util/header.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-08-18 11:24 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Drop unneeded bitmap_zero() calls tip-bot for Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180724200356.GA22741@yury-thinkpad \
--to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox