From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] userfaultfd: selftest: Fix checking of userfaultfd_open() result
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:59:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725135942.GC25188@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180725024209.32586-2-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:42:07PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> If the userfaultfd test is run on a kernel with CONFIG_USERFAULTFD=n, it
> will report that the system call is not available yet go ahead and continue
> anyway:
>
> # ./userfaultfd anon 30 1
> nr_pages: 480, nr_pages_per_cpu: 120
> userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel
> bounces: 0, mode:, register failure
>
> This is because userfaultfd_open() returns 0 on success and 1 on error but
> all callers assume that it returns < 0 on error.
>
> Since the convention of the test as a whole is the one used by
> userfault_open(), fix its callers instead. Now the test behaves correctly:
>
> # ./userfaultfd anon 30 1
> nr_pages: 480, nr_pages_per_cpu: 120
> userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel
>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
It seems that this patch is superseded by the second patch in this series.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> index 7b8171e3128a..e4099afe7557 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
> if (uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst))
> return 1;
>
> - if (userfaultfd_open(0) < 0)
> + if (userfaultfd_open(0))
> return 1;
> uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
> uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
> @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void)
>
> features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP |
> UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE;
> - if (userfaultfd_open(features) < 0)
> + if (userfaultfd_open(features))
> return 1;
> fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
>
> @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void)
> return 1;
>
> features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK|UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS;
> - if (userfaultfd_open(features) < 0)
> + if (userfaultfd_open(features))
> return 1;
> fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
>
> @@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
> if (!area_dst)
> return 1;
>
> - if (userfaultfd_open(0) < 0)
> + if (userfaultfd_open(0))
> return 1;
>
> count_verify = malloc(nr_pages * sizeof(unsigned long long));
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-25 2:42 [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: selftest: Improve behavior with older kernels Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-07-25 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] userfaultfd: selftest: Fix checking of userfaultfd_open() result Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-07-25 13:59 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2018-07-30 23:53 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-07-25 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-07-25 14:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-30 23:54 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-07-25 2:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] userfaultfd: selftest: Report XFAIL if shmem doesn't support zeropage Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-07-25 14:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-31 0:01 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725135942.GC25188@rapoport-lnx \
--to=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox