From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, vkuznets@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
efault@gmx.de, dave.hansen@intel.com, will.daecon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:53:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180728215357.3249-4-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180728215357.3249-1-riel@surriel.com>
Introduce a variant of on_each_cpu_cond that iterates only over the
CPUs in a cpumask, in order to avoid making callbacks for every single
CPU in the system when we only need to test a subset.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
---
include/linux/smp.h | 4 ++++
kernel/smp.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
kernel/up.c | 14 +++++++++++---
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 9fb239e12b82..a56f08ff3097 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
gfp_t gfp_flags);
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask);
+
int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 2dbc842dd385..f4cf1b0bb3b8 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -667,9 +667,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
* from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags)
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
cpumask_var_t cpus;
int cpu, ret;
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
if (likely(zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, (gfp_flags|__GFP_NOWARN)))) {
preempt_disable();
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
if (cond_func(cpu, info))
__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
on_each_cpu_mask(cpus, func, info, wait);
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
* just have to IPI them one by one.
*/
preempt_disable();
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
if (cond_func(cpu, info)) {
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func,
info, wait);
@@ -699,6 +699,15 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
preempt_enable();
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
+
+void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+ on_each_cpu_cond_mask(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags,
+ cpu_online_mask);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);
static void do_nothing(void *unused)
diff --git a/kernel/up.c b/kernel/up.c
index 42c46bf3e0a5..ff536f9cc8a2 100644
--- a/kernel/up.c
+++ b/kernel/up.c
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* Preemption is disabled here to make sure the cond_func is called under the
* same condtions in UP and SMP.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags)
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
}
preempt_enable();
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
+
+void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+ on_each_cpu_cond_mask(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags, NULL);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);
int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int (*func)(void *), void *par, bool phys)
--
2.14.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-28 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-28 21:53 [PATCH 0/10] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86,tlb: clarify memory barrier in switch_mm_irqs_off Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 2:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] smp: use __cpumask_set_cpu in on_each_cpu_cond Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 2:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2018-07-29 2:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:00 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <E710FBA5-CC5E-4941-ACBF-4AB3424F1F68@amacapital.net>
2018-07-29 17:39 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 17:51 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 18:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86,mm: use on_each_cpu_cond for TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 2:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:02 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm,tlb: turn dummy defines into inline functions Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm,x86: skip cr4 and ldt reload when mm stays the same Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 4:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86,mm: remove leave_mm cpu argument Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] arch,mm: add config variable to skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm,x86: shoot down lazy TLB references at exit_mmap time Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 4:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:11 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 15:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 16:55 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86,tlb: really leave mm on shootdown Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 14:30 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 19:15 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 19:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-30 19:36 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 19:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-30 21:46 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 22:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-31 1:05 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-31 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-31 14:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-31 15:03 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-31 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 11:32 ` [PATCH 0/10] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180728215357.3249-4-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=will.daecon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox