From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA87C28CF6 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 21:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BCC208AF for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 21:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lcq0Ccl1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 43BCC208AF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732543AbeHAXY5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:24:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38790 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732307AbeHAXY4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:24:56 -0400 Received: from jouet.infradead.org (unknown [179.97.41.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12722208AD; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1533159429; bh=e31xYfVSDCQyu5QjA8xWA7alP8PFyVz2a+YtT82khb4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lcq0Ccl12KQhTS+TaBJkjJqFwQ2ieKnbnT2WTfK/KTJt8O/IWnwqCrFLPDg9752RW LfsF18BGKOoXD3ud8kZ838vElGXWcfFgOVSXZ/WF0DcXPqQlZU/6/FHbzhtj0mST6P X7QaeTNE90m845QWKonaGDF29g71wm2prrvJX2KU= From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Kan Liang , Andi Kleen , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 02/21] perf evlist: Fix error out while applying initial delay and LBR Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 18:36:29 -0300 Message-Id: <20180801213648.4814-3-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.4 In-Reply-To: <20180801213648.4814-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20180801213648.4814-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kan Liang 'perf record' will error out if both --delay and LBR are applied. For example: # perf record -D 1000 -a -e cycles -j any -- sleep 2 Error: dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat' # A dummy event is added implicitly for initial delay, which has the same configurations as real sampling events. The dummy event is a software event. If LBR is configured, perf must error out. The dummy event will only be used to track PERF_RECORD_MMAP while perf waits for the initial delay to enable the real events. The BRANCH_STACK bit can be safely cleared for the dummy event. After applying the patch: # perf record -D 1000 -a -e cycles -j any -- sleep 2 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.054 MB perf.data (828 samples) ] # Reported-by: Sunil K Pandey Signed-off-by: Kan Liang Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531145722-16404-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c index 5285da0417c5..ddf84b941abf 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c @@ -859,6 +859,12 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel, } } +static bool is_dummy_event(struct perf_evsel *evsel) +{ + return (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE) && + (evsel->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY); +} + /* * The enable_on_exec/disabled value strategy: * @@ -1097,6 +1103,14 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts, else perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD); } + + /* + * For initial_delay, a dummy event is added implicitly. + * The software event will trigger -EOPNOTSUPP error out, + * if BRANCH_STACK bit is set. + */ + if (opts->initial_delay && is_dummy_event(evsel)) + perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK); } static int perf_evsel__alloc_fd(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads) -- 2.14.4