* [linux-next] DDC responded, but no EDID for %s errors @ 2018-08-02 2:46 Sergey Senozhatsky 2018-09-06 2:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2018-08-02 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Skeggs; +Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel Hi, My dmesg is filled up with these errors nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [..] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [..] Basically, a message every 10s or so. Any chance we can make them go away? -ss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next] DDC responded, but no EDID for %s errors 2018-08-02 2:46 [linux-next] DDC responded, but no EDID for %s errors Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2018-09-06 2:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2018-09-06 2:46 ` Ben Skeggs 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2018-09-06 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Skeggs, David Airlie Cc: dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Sergey Senozhatsky On (08/02/18 11:46), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hi, > > My dmesg is filled up with these errors > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [..] > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [..] > > Basically, a message every 10s or so. Any chance we can make them > go away? A gentle ping? It literally floods my logbuf with that "DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1" thing. name -a 4.19.0-rc2-dbg-00118-gb9a3bad8af2d $ dmesg | tail -42 [ 3615.796938] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3626.036865] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3636.276878] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3646.516866] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3656.756750] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3666.996949] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3677.236884] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3687.476865] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3697.716858] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3707.956934] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3718.196925] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3728.436884] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3738.676861] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3748.916731] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3759.156754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3769.396861] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3779.636826] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3789.876892] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3800.116686] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3810.356926] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3820.596887] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3830.836909] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3841.076932] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3851.316681] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3861.556926] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3871.796869] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3882.036750] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3892.276836] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3902.516803] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3912.756640] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3922.996957] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3933.236700] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3943.476851] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3953.716928] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3963.956915] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3974.196861] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3984.436928] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 3994.676885] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 4004.917030] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 4015.156935] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 4025.396872] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 [ 4035.636877] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 -ss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next] DDC responded, but no EDID for %s errors 2018-09-06 2:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2018-09-06 2:46 ` Ben Skeggs 2018-09-06 2:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ben Skeggs @ 2018-09-06 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sergey.senozhatsky.work; +Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel, nouveau, LKML, torvalds On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote: > > On (08/02/18 11:46), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My dmesg is filled up with these errors > > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > [..] > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > [..] > > > > Basically, a message every 10s or so. Any chance we can make them > > go away? > > A gentle ping? I've got patches queued in my tree to resolve this, I will get them to drm-fixes shortly. Ben. > > It literally floods my logbuf with that "DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID > for VGA-1" thing. > > name -a > 4.19.0-rc2-dbg-00118-gb9a3bad8af2d > > $ dmesg | tail -42 > [ 3615.796938] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3626.036865] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3636.276878] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3646.516866] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3656.756750] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3666.996949] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3677.236884] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3687.476865] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3697.716858] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3707.956934] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3718.196925] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3728.436884] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3738.676861] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3748.916731] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3759.156754] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3769.396861] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3779.636826] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3789.876892] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3800.116686] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3810.356926] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3820.596887] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3830.836909] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3841.076932] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3851.316681] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3861.556926] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3871.796869] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3882.036750] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3892.276836] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3902.516803] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3912.756640] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3922.996957] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3933.236700] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3943.476851] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3953.716928] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3963.956915] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3974.196861] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3984.436928] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 3994.676885] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 4004.917030] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 4015.156935] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 4025.396872] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > [ 4035.636877] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > -ss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next] DDC responded, but no EDID for %s errors 2018-09-06 2:46 ` Ben Skeggs @ 2018-09-06 2:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2018-09-06 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Skeggs Cc: sergey.senozhatsky.work, David Airlie, dri-devel, nouveau, LKML, torvalds On (09/06/18 12:46), Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sergey Senozhatsky > <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On (08/02/18 11:46), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > My dmesg is filled up with these errors > > > > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > [..] > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 > > > [..] > > > > > > Basically, a message every 10s or so. Any chance we can make them > > > go away? > > > > A gentle ping? > I've got patches queued in my tree to resolve this, I will get them to > drm-fixes shortly. Thanks! -ss ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-06 2:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-08-02 2:46 [linux-next] DDC responded, but no EDID for %s errors Sergey Senozhatsky 2018-09-06 2:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2018-09-06 2:46 ` Ben Skeggs 2018-09-06 2:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox