public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Improve behavior with older kernels
Date: Fri,  3 Aug 2018 19:00:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180803220046.4019-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello,

A tester ran the upstream selftest on a distro kernel and sounded the alarm when
it reported failures for features which aren't included in that kernel.

This patch set improves the test behavior in that scenario.

Changes since v1:

- Patch "userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall
  not supported"
  - New patch, suggested by Mke Rapoport.

- Patch "userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported"
  - Try running other tests even if one (or more) of them returns KSFT_SKIP.

- Patch "userfaultfd: selftest: Cope if shmem doesn't support zeropage"
  - Ignore lack of UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE in userfaultfd_events_test() and
    userfaultfd_stress().
  - Make userfaultfd_zeropage_test() return KSFT_SKIP if UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE
    isn't supported.

Thiago Jung Bauermann (4):
  userfaultfd: selftest: Fix checking of userfaultfd_open() result
  userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall not
    supported
  userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported
  userfaultfd: selftest: Cope if shmem doesn't support zeropage

 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2018-08-03 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-03 22:00 Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Fix checking of userfaultfd_open() result Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07  6:50   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall not supported Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07  6:50   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07  6:51   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Cope if shmem doesn't support zeropage Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07  6:56   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-28  2:46     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28  6:15       ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180803220046.4019-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox