From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D513C46470 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A3E2172F for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:35:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 62A3E2172F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389543AbeHGUu7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:50:59 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:45800 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389443AbeHGUu7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:50:59 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2018 11:35:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,456,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="64275467" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.126]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2018 11:35:20 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 698E13013C5; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:35:20 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake Message-ID: <20180807183520.GQ4238@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1533662247-17575-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1533662247-17575-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:17:27AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Kan Liang > > Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for > Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used. > > DENVERTON is Goldmont server SoC. Rename DENVERTON to GOLDMONT2, similar > to SILVERMONT2 being the silvermont server SoCs. > > Rename GEMINI_LAKE to GOLDMONT_PLUS. That doesn't make sense. Goldmont Plus can be in other SOCs with different Model numbers too. 0x7a really means Gemini Lake SOC, but not all systems containing a Goldmont Plus. Also all the other identifiers are for SOCs too. -Andi