Re: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Fix a couple of typos

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 02:29:28PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> This commit fixes a couple of typos in README and recipies.txt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>

Good catch on the first "The the"!  (Why say it once when you can say
it twice?)

On the second, the quoted output doesn't have a comma, so the quote of
that output also needs not to have a comma.  So I applied the first
patch and left out the second.  But please let me know if I am missing
something.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +-
>  tools/memory-model/README                    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
> index a40802fa1099..29df496c1c77 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ The smp_wmb() macro orders prior stores against later stores, and the
>  smp_rmb() macro orders prior loads against later loads.  Therefore, if
>  the final value of r0 is 1, the final value of r1 must also be 1.
> 
> -The the xlog_state_switch_iclogs() function in fs/xfs/xfs_log.c contains
> +The xlog_state_switch_iclogs() function in fs/xfs/xfs_log.c contains
>  the following write-side code fragment:
> 
>  	log->l_curr_block -= log->l_logBBsize;
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/README b/tools/memory-model/README
> index ee987ce20aae..73313faf4036 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/README
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/README
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ The corresponding output includes:
>    Observation SB+fencembonceonces Never 0 2000000
>    Time SB+fencembonceonces 0.16
> 
> -The "Positive: 0 Negative: 2000000" and the "Never 0 2000000" indicate
> +The "Positive: 0, Negative: 2000000" and the "Never 0 2000000" indicate
>  that during two million trials, the state specified in this litmus
>  test's "exists" clause was not reached.
> 
> -- 
> 2.13.0
>