From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: Access kobject name with caution if state is not initialized
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:46:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821064652.GB33230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdAkRT3OfvcvHdNC4Jn1RfM76TUHohcXVFDA0QfsSPdTW348Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [2018-08-20 12:33:50]:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:39:47PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Lots of stupid modules can do dumb things. Just don't do that. The
> > kernel is not built to keep you from doing stupid things in kernel code
> > :)
> >
> > So I fail to see why this patch is needed. What in-kernel code path is
> > trying to print a kobject's name before it is initialized? Why not fix
> > that obvious bug instead of forcing the kernel core to protect from
> > stupid code?
>
> Kay decided to add some guards in:
>
> commit 0f4dafc0563c6c49e17fe14b3f5f356e4c4b8806
> Author: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> Date: Wed Dec 19 01:40:42 2007 +0100
>
> Kobject: auto-cleanup on final unref
> ...
>
> + if (!kobj->state_initialized) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "kobject '%s' (%p): tried to add an "
> + "uninitialized object, something is seriously wrong.\n",
> + kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
> + dump_stack();
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Given that we have dump_stack() we can probably simply drop
> kobject_name(kobj) instead of building even more elaborate checks. Or
> just drop the whole check. Adding kobjects is somewhat uncommon
> operation, plus "gabage in, garbage out".
>
Dropping the kobject_name(kobj) should also be okay.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-20 17:09 [PATCH] kobject: Access kobject name with caution if state is not initialized Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-20 19:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-08-20 19:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-08-21 6:46 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2018-08-21 4:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821064652.GB33230@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).