From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [ipc] 296ba26b66: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/memory.c
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 21:14:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180823041434.GC3677@linux-r8p5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823024051.GC13343@shao2-debian>
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, kernel test robot wrote:
>FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
>
>commit: 296ba26b6681b6e07ed419b3004647167cb17f61 ("ipc: drop ipc_lock()")
>https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
I suspect this is because that commit forgot to set EIDRM for the
!ipc_valid_object() case. So the callers check IS_ERR(shm_lock()),
which won't fail the op as it did before the commit.
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index b0eb3757ab89..4cd402e4cfeb 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
}
ipc_unlock_object(ipcp);
+ ipcp = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
err:
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 2:40 [lkp-robot] [ipc] 296ba26b66: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/memory.c kernel test robot
2018-08-23 4:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2018-08-24 3:09 ` [PATCH] ipc/shm: properly return EIDRM in shm_lock() Davidlohr Bueso
2018-09-25 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-25 17:23 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180823041434.GC3677@linux-r8p5 \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).