From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit kaslr to choosing the immovable memory
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:10:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180827071032.GE1748@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180827055607.GB1748@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 08/27/18 at 01:56pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 08/07/18 at 02:50pm, Chao Fan wrote:
> > If 'CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE' specified and the account of immovable
> If CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE is enabled,
> > memory regions is not zero. Calculate the intersection between memory
> > regions from e820/efi memory table and immovable memory regions.
> > Or go on the old code.
> >
> > Rename process_mem_region to slots_count to match slots_fetch_random,
> > and name new function as process_mem_region.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > index 720878f967a3..9c6e24a23a2d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > @@ -635,9 +635,9 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
> > - unsigned long minimum,
> > - unsigned long image_size)
> > +static void slots_count(struct mem_vector *entry,
> > + unsigned long minimum,
> > + unsigned long image_size)
> > {
> > struct mem_vector region, overlap;
> > struct slot_area slot_area;
> > @@ -714,6 +714,56 @@ static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
> > + unsigned long long minimum,
> > + unsigned long long image_size)
> > +{
>
> Is it possible to take num_immovable_mem definition out from #ifdef
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE block and check it here like below? This way,
> one level of indentation can be reduced in the for loop, and code is
> more readable.
>
>
> static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
> unsigned long long minimum,
> unsigned long long image_size)
> {
>
> /*
> * If no immovable memory found, or MEMORY_HOTREMOVE disabled,
> * walk all the regions, so use region directely.
> */
> if (num_immovable_mem > 0) {
Sorry, I meant if (!num_immovable_mem) {
> slots_count(region, minimum, image_size);
>
> if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> for (i = 0; i < num_immovable_mem; i++) {
> ...
> }
> #endif
> }
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> > + /*
> > + * If immovable memory found, filter the intersection between
> > + * immovable memory and region to slots_count.
> > + * Otherwise, go on old code.
> > + */
> > + if (num_immovable_mem > 0) {
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_immovable_mem; i++) {
> > + struct mem_vector entry;
> > + unsigned long long start, end, entry_end, region_end;
> > +
> > + start = immovable_mem[i].start;
> > + end = start + immovable_mem[i].size;
> > + region_end = region->start + region->size;
> > +
> > + entry.start = clamp(region->start, start, end);
> > + entry_end = clamp(region_end, start, end);
> > +
> > + if (entry.start + image_size < entry_end) {
> > + entry.size = entry_end - entry.start;
> > + slots_count(&entry, minimum, image_size);
> > +
> > + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> > + debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > + /*
> > + * If no immovable memory found, or MEMORY_HOTREMOVE disabled,
> > + * walk all the regions, so use region directely.
> > + */
> > + slots_count(region, minimum, image_size);
> > +
> > + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> > + debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> > /*
> > * Returns true if mirror region found (and must have been processed
> > @@ -779,11 +829,8 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
> >
> > region.start = md->phys_addr;
> > region.size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> > - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
> > - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> > - debug_putstr("Aborted EFI scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> > + if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
> > break;
> > - }
> > }
> > return true;
> > }
> > @@ -810,11 +857,8 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum,
> > continue;
> > region.start = entry->addr;
> > region.size = entry->size;
> > - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
> > - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> > - debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> > + if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
> > break;
> > - }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-07 6:49 [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-08-07 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] x86/boot: Add acpitb.h to help parse acpi tables Chao Fan
2018-08-07 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/boot: Add acpitb.c to " Chao Fan
2018-08-27 9:32 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-07 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-08-23 7:25 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-23 7:30 ` Chao Fan
2018-08-27 2:13 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-27 2:56 ` Chao Fan
2018-08-27 3:07 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-07 6:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit kaslr to choosing the " Chao Fan
2018-08-27 5:35 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-27 6:04 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-27 5:56 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-27 6:28 ` Chao Fan
2018-08-27 6:31 ` Chao Fan
2018-08-27 7:01 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-27 7:10 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2018-08-23 1:37 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in " Chao Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180827071032.GE1748@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox