public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2]: perf: reduce data loss when profiling highly parallel CPU bound workloads
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:59:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180828085904.GH23727@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdd669cd-a6dc-d592-4655-33b7bfc46cbb@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:03:21PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> Currently in record mode the tool implements trace writing serially. 
> The algorithm loops over mapped per-cpu data buffers and stores ready 
> data chunks into a trace file using write() system call.
> 
> At some circumstances the kernel may lack free space in a buffer 
> because the other buffer's half is not yet written to disk due to 
> some other buffer's data writing by the tool at the moment.
> 
> Thus serial trace writing implementation may cause the kernel 
> to loose profiling data and that is what observed when profiling 
> highly parallel CPU bound workloads on machines with big number 
> of cores.
> 
> Experiment with profiling matrix multiplication code executing 128 
> threads on Intel Xeon Phi (KNM) with 272 cores, like below,
> demonstrates data loss metrics value of 98%:
> 
> /usr/bin/time perf record -o /tmp/perf-ser.data -a -N -B -T -R -g \
>     --call-graph dwarf,1024 --user-regs=IP,SP,BP \
>     --switch-events -e cycles,instructions,ref-cycles,software/period=1,name=cs,config=0x3/Duk -- \
>     matrix.gcc
> 
> Data loss metrics is the ratio lost_time/elapsed_time where 
> lost_time is the sum of time intervals containing PERF_RECORD_LOST 
> records and elapsed_time is the elapsed application run time 
> under profiling.

I like the idea and I think it's good direction to go, but could
you please share some from perf stat or whatever you used to meassure
the new performance?

thanks,
jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-28  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bdd669cd-a6dc-d592-4655-33b7bfc46cbb@linux.intel.com>
2018-08-27 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/2]: perf util: map data buffer for preserving collected data Alexey Budankov
2018-08-27 18:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/2]: perf record: enable asynchronous trace writing Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28  8:50   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28  9:39     ` Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28  8:53   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28 10:28     ` Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28  8:57   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28 11:31     ` Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28 12:21       ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28  9:01   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28 12:37     ` Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28  8:59 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-08-28 11:58   ` [PATCH v3 0/2]: perf: reduce data loss when profiling highly parallel CPU bound workloads Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28 14:17     ` Alexey Budankov
2018-08-28 14:08   ` Alexey Budankov
2018-08-27 18:39 Alexey Budankov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180828085904.GH23727@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox