From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF21C433F4 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5527B2087A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hDOj07/O" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5527B2087A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727341AbeH1Tx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:53:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:36502 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727039AbeH1Tx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:53:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id d1-v6so953913pgo.3 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:01:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Oh0GfifA4i0ev1iszadGeqlJllSKMo/Ln/SDnmmybbk=; b=hDOj07/OikB26mp/yUnAokIgWQf/SryROwEXjftZn7e85XytEj5MAF14utyk2liYqK rR0GxxCWb51P2RIjIKcHgLJ5Hr7YrJRqT6k23XhQapelxlUNyLyKDQEBrJkyf0S553nZ BLuDTyDjuPhCZjNFpeMokRnVeb6zBky6PvuEcxbcEPU75Tw/p1/YVMVkHH7veIfRsBHY xP3WReCbQOeTPNNV8yAziOLFOsKhSISVeX3GiONOY22XZjMfPFdyyOJZn6UTrikU44ng zTHVbBeMBAL6WA88D4dpMI8okzCvwsZyy7usZ1gaycRqSVRrgJGSEEKcLHSPsaEiClwX 1AAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Oh0GfifA4i0ev1iszadGeqlJllSKMo/Ln/SDnmmybbk=; b=sDLFXVdBb3tDfWz7+eu0rqCM7cr6G3Z1DRodZTDKUr1jUxA13OpXMejK6T9BTFL6xt eF1LhHUT0w8KKv9izyDhqvVrLU43gVA9ouYH1geSZuRgpdvIcvNnT/c/8ErIbk/rreeV nOd+cnDvYVYq4gakTzOkmh4QoU1PnugmnUa/8YfCVBCmX6BG2/A7zs8DhTw/4irVaCtV zCC5juwdlhxGVYPJWbTbZ4itoKq1o5qe7xFyx2hvdkAYXRvVlCk5lwj/YKStiKOCxZ2k Z5zkR86KXjQw5ZC+TxKNkx+4Z2JAMC4Qj6bKqft9T+k4FGi9bmAyw0IFtUVozb6GnzF3 PLYg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BLNtDHShKFtQToeDjaX3CX5hT3WcRS7wtCAsXOu2ctmjPqjCrO HxUcjzxQhY4jsQGZ/Cw0UN1OxYxJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYFrKbSHf9okkpOgcnnQZPXCfe3v2C3g7DGcHFmF7OE0AnGpCe1tdhxCbkdnXygQ8XkDjqyOw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:c699:: with SMTP id x25-v6mr2259099pfk.16.1535472096554; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.223.40.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x87-v6sm4725400pfa.143.2018.08.28.09.01.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:01:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:01:34 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 4.19-rc1 Message-ID: <20180828160134.GA17166@roeck-us.net> References: <20180827134459.GA16094@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:56:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:45 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > Build results: > > total: 132 pass: 129 fail: 3 > > Thanks for running these. Looks like everything but the sparc thing is > under control, and the sparc thing might be one of those "big builds > don't work on sparc" ;( > In general I would agree. On the other side, someone who knows sparc assembler should be able to fix the problem. sparc is notorious for failing allmodconfig builds, mostly due to its separate devicetree implementation. On top of that, many allmodconfig builds already fail, often for minor reasons such as duplicate symbols or missing exports. Dropping sparc:allmodconfig will cause sparc builds to deteriorate, and we'll lose valuable build feedback. On the plus side, sparc64:allmodconfig still builds, but that doesn't cover 32/64 bit differences. I'll monitor the situation for a while and stop building sparc:allmodconfig if the problem isn't fixed around -rc7. Guenter