From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf script: callchain handling is not useful
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:54:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829135440.GA25381@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBTT-PSP+0sZc-EyrRtOLfLVPxOxwuDpxhGhGZLOe5L0CA@mail.gmail.com>
Em Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 07:41:31PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing the following simple collection with callchain and load profiling:
>
> $ perf record -g -d -e cpu/event=0xd0,umask=0x81/pp my_test_program
>
> But when I type:
> $ perf script -F ip,addr
> ffff9d4821346878
> ffffffff9d58df25
> ffffffff9d58e054
> ffffffff9d5965bb
> ffffffff9d640650
> ffffffff9d697d06
> ffffffff9d63ec60
> ffffffff9d640322
> ffffffff9d64070c
> ffffffff9d455a60
> 7030c7
>
> ffff9d4638ba84a0
> ffffffff9d5df447
> ffffffff9d5eaf4a
> ffffffff9d63e165
> ffffffff9d63e439
> ffffffff9d697d98
> ffffffff9d63ec60
> ffffffff9d640322
> ffffffff9d64070c
> ffffffff9d455a60
> 7030c7
> I also see the callchain and it is not clear which is the IP. Further
> more parsing becomes more difficult because of multiple lines per
> sample. I understand that multiline is likely because of
> symbolization. But if I don't want symbolization, it should be
> possible to print all in one line.
Humm, to have this not break possibly existing scripts, perhaps we can
have something like:
$ perf script -F ip,-callchain,addr
?
And if asked explicitely for the callchain, then it gets added in the
same line?
- Arnaldo
> The current output is not very useful. You expect perf script to give
> you one line per sample and only what you want. Callchain != IP.
>
> I think the following should happen:
> - do not print callchain when asked for the IP. Create a callchain filter.
> - print callchain on the same line, much like what is done for brstack
>
> It is not clear to me why callchain and ip were lumped together.
> Any opinion on my proposal?
> Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 2:41 [RFC] perf script: callchain handling is not useful Stephane Eranian
2018-08-29 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-08-29 15:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-08-30 0:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-08-30 5:01 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829135440.GA25381@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox