From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Compiler Attributes: use feature checks instead of version checks
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 11:39:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180901183920.GA8341@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72mfuJ2=v8U9vUs1vJVEjY2sp7f-WbTRZRHNvgh+VbAgnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> > Overall, pretty happy with this patch. Still some thoughts for a v3,
> >> -#define __visible __attribute__((externally_visible))
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..a9dfafc8fd19
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
> >
> > New file needs an SPDX license identifier right?
>
> Yeah, but I wasn't sure of adding it, since the code I moved (even if
> rearranged) from _types.h does not have it either. Any legal expert
> here? Is _types.h it implicitly GPL 2? We should add the identifier to
> both if so.
It looks like we missed that file in the big "properly add SPDX
identifiers to all files without a license" commit as it came in from a
different tree.
But yes, it is GPLv2 only implicitly, so you can add that. I should
sweep the tree again to see if anything else has been added accidentally
with that same problem.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-01 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-31 17:05 [PATCH 1/7] Compiler Attributes: remove unused attributes Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] Compiler Attributes: use the no-underscores syntax Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 18:51 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-08-31 19:17 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 21:49 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-08-31 22:10 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 22:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-09-03 6:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-03 10:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] Compiler Attributes: remove unneeded tests Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 21:10 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-01 8:16 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-01 9:56 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-31 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] Compiler Attributes: homogenize __must_be_array Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 21:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-01 9:17 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-09-01 12:11 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] Compiler Attributes: naked was fixed in gcc 4.6 Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 19:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-31 20:26 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] Compiler Attributes: remove unneeded sparse (__CHECKER__) tests Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 21:38 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-08-31 21:55 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 22:39 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-08-31 17:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] Compiler Attributes: use feature checks instead of version checks Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 23:07 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-01 13:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-09-01 18:39 ` Greg KH [this message]
2018-09-01 19:15 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-09-01 9:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-01 9:51 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-01 9:56 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-09-01 12:58 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-09-01 10:14 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-01 12:55 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-09-01 14:17 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-03 18:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] Compiler Attributes: remove unused attributes Joe Perches
2018-08-31 18:43 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-08-31 18:53 ` Joe Perches
2018-08-31 20:23 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 21:27 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-02 19:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-03 11:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-08-31 18:39 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180901183920.GA8341@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=efriedma@codeaurora.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox