From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings from the build of Linus' tree
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 18:50:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180901185017.0a81bc3e61f5d021664f13f3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1fsQUbUB4fEgTxm6voKjPFV0_RaBhuPBVxhnaRWBnC_g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 21:53:17 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 8:53 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:46:16 +0200
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:23 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:32:06 +1000
> > > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > > allyesconfig) produced these warnings:
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe introduced by commit
> > > > >
> > > > > 6b7dca401cb1 ("tracing: Allow gcov profiling on only ftrace subsystem")
> > > > >
> > > > > I am guessing, but that is the only new thing that affects all of
> > > > > kernel/trace ...
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I agree. But I just followed Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst
> > > > to enable profiling in kernel/trace. Hmm, doesn't ppc64 support
> > > > GCOV_PROFILE? (But as far as I can see, ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
> > > > is enabled in arch/powerpc/Kconfig)
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I'll try to reproduce it.
> > >
> > > Thje same commit causes a link failure on ARM with a randconfig
> > > kernel (see https://pastebin.com/KspjpyKG for the .config):
> >
> > OK, I confirmed that this happened with both gcc-7.3.0 and gcc-8.1.0
> > with your config.
> > I also confirmed that CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL causes same issue.
> > (Note that CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL depends on !CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST,
> > so allyesconfig disables it always)
> >
> > Hmm, now gcov kernel itself might have a problem on arm and
> > powerpc(on gcc-8)?
>
> Yes, that is very possible. I always force CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y
> in my randconfig tests, so I miss that kind of problem.
Finally, I've found that this issue (on arm) can be reproduced
with a combination of config options.
When CONFIG_BUG=n and CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL|FTRACE=y on arm,
this happened. If I set CONFIG_BUG=y, I could build the kernel
without these errors.
I also built on x86-64 with CONFIG_BUG=n & CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_FTRACE=y,
but it succeeded. I guess arm kernel need to embed a counter near the
code section. So if it is in .text.exit, it caused the error.
On arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.h:
#if (defined(CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)) || \
defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG) || defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
#define ARM_EXIT_KEEP(x) x
#define ARM_EXIT_DISCARD(x)
#else
#define ARM_EXIT_KEEP(x)
#define ARM_EXIT_DISCARD(x) x
#endif
So I think we have to add CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL to there.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-01 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-24 3:32 linux-next: build warnings from the build of Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-24 8:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-24 11:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-24 12:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-25 1:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-26 8:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 21:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-28 0:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-06 10:49 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2018-09-06 16:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-07 12:50 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2018-09-08 3:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-10 13:27 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2018-09-11 11:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-11 14:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-06 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-07 3:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-11 0:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-11 7:44 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2018-10-11 9:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-11 10:37 ` Greg KH
2018-10-11 11:09 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2018-10-11 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-11 22:12 ` [GIT PULL] A couple of warning fixes Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-12 10:51 ` Greg KH
2018-08-24 12:46 ` linux-next: build warnings from the build of Linus' tree Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-25 18:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-25 19:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-01 9:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-09-01 12:38 ` [PATCH] ARM: linker script: GCOV kernel may refers data in __exit Masami Hiramatsu
2018-09-11 14:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-29 2:11 ` linux-next: build warnings from the build of Linus' tree Greentime Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180901185017.0a81bc3e61f5d021664f13f3@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).