From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf tool improvement requests
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:35:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904143507.GC5364@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904141724.GJ24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Em Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Then I need to get the DW_AT_location stuff parsed in pahole, so
> > that with those offsets (second column, ending with :) with hits (first
> > column, there its local period, but we can ask for some specific metric
> > [1]), I'll be able to figure out what DW_TAG_variable or
> > DW_TAG_formal_parameter is living there at that time, get the offset
> > from the decoded instruction, say that xor, 0x138 offset from the type
> > for %r15 at that offset (85) from kmem_cache_alloc, right?
>
> I'm not sure how the DWARF location stuff works; it could be it already
> includes the offset and decoding the instruction is not needed.
>
> But yes, that's the basic idea; get DWARF to tell you what variable is
> used at a certain IP.
>
> > In a first milestone we'd have something like:
> >
> > perf annotate --hits function | pahole --annotate -C task_struct
> >
> > perf annotate --hits | pahole --annotate
>
> Not sure keeping it two proglets makes sense, but whatever :-)
This is just a start, trying to take advantage of existing codebases.
> The alternative I suppose is making perf do the IP->struct::member
> mapping and freed that to pahole, which then only uses it to annotate
> the output.
So, what I'm trying to do now is to make perf get the samples associated
with functions/offsets + decoded instructions.
Pahole, that already touches DWARF info, will just use the
DW_AT_location, look at its description, from
https://blog.tartanllama.xyz/writing-a-linux-debugger-variables/:
-------------------
Simple location descriptions describe the location of one contiguous
piece (usually all) of an object. A simple location description may
describe a location in addressable memory, or in a register, or the lack
of a location (with or without a known value).
Example:
DW_OP_fbreg -32
A variable which is entirely stored -32 bytes from the stack
frame base.
Composite location descriptions describe an object in terms of pieces,
each of which may be contained in part of a register or stored in a
memory location unrelated to other pieces.
Example:
DW_OP_reg3 DW_OP_piece 4 DW_OP_reg10 DW_OP_piece 2
A variable whose first four bytes reside in register 3 and
whose next two bytes reside in register 10.
Location lists describe objects which have a limited lifetime or change
location during their lifetime.
Example:
<loclist with 3 entries follows>
[ 0]<lowpc=0x2e00><highpc=0x2e19>DW_OP_reg0
[ 1]<lowpc=0x2e19><highpc=0x2e3f>DW_OP_reg3
[ 2]<lowpc=0x2ec4><highpc=0x2ec7>DW_OP_reg2
A variable whose location moves between registers depending
on the current value of the program counter
-------------------
So I have a list of DW_TAG_formal_parameter (function parameters) and
DW_TAG_variable, and the above location lists/descriptions, stating in
what registers and what IP ranges the variables are in, and in the
DW_TAG_{formal_parameter,variable} I have DW_AT_type, that points to the
type of that variable, couple that with the offset taken from the
decoded instruction we get from 'perf annotate --hits' and we should
have all we need, no?
Then pahole can have all this painted on structs (like 'perf annotate')
for the whole workload, or for specific callchains, etc.
> Or, munge the entirety of pahole into perf..
That may be interesting at some point, yes.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-04 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 2:45 [RFC] perf tool improvement requests Stephane Eranian
2018-09-04 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-04 13:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-04 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-04 13:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-09-04 14:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-04 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-04 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-09-04 15:50 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-09-04 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180904143507.GC5364@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox