From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7943EC433F5 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F95320658 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:05:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3F95320658 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727530AbeIEKdW (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:33:22 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:58292 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726528AbeIEKdW (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:33:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535D787A50; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (ovpn-116-66.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.66]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D7B2156899; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40B1617514; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:04:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerd Hoffmann To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: michel@daenzer.net, imirkin@alum.mit.edu, Gerd Hoffmann , Gustavo Padovan , Maarten Lankhorst , Sean Paul , David Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] drm: do not mask out DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:04:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20180905060445.15008-4-kraxel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180905060445.15008-1-kraxel@redhat.com> References: <20180905060445.15008-1-kraxel@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.1]); Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:04:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.1]); Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:04:49 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.6' DOMAIN:'int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'kraxel@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org framebuffer_check() expects that drm_get_format_info() will not fail if the __drm_format_info() call was successful. That'll work only in case both are called with the same pixel_format value, so masking out the DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN flag isn't a good idea. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c index 17b7b8944d..888c4d53cf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int framebuffer_check(struct drm_device *dev, int i; /* check if the format is supported at all */ - info = __drm_format_info(r->pixel_format & ~DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN); + info = __drm_format_info(r->pixel_format); if (!info) { struct drm_format_name_buf format_name; -- 2.9.3