public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 regression fix] printk: For early boot messages check loglevel when flushing the buffer
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 16:29:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906072940.GA382@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905110207.rxy3upplgkjbk5oi@pathway.suse.cz>

On (09/05/18 13:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> Note that the first registered console prints all messages
> even without this flag.

Hmm, OK, interesting point.

I assumed that the first console usually has CON_PRINTBUFFER bit set.
Or even a CON_PRINTBUFFER | CON_ANYTIME combo. E.g. 8250. It sort of
makes sense to have CON_PRINTBUFFER for the first console. Any later
consoles [e.g. fbcon, netcon] don't necessarily have CON_PRINTBUFFER.

So by the time we have callable console "quite" param should be already
parsed [except the earlycon case perhaps]:

	kernel_init_freeable
	 do_one_initcall
	  register_console
happens after
	setup_arch
	 parse_early_param
	  quiet_kernel/debug_kernel.

And
	setup_arch
	 parse_early_param
	  quiet_kernel/debug_kernel
happens before
	console_init
	 con_init
	  register_console.

And the first console has CON_PRINTBUFFER bit set. Well, just because
it sounds reasonable. Those were the main assumptions behind my code
snippet. Was any of those assumptions wrong?

> I played with another solution, see the patch below. It defines
> which messages have a valid NOCONS flag according to the msg_seq
> number. IMHO, it is a bit more straightforward but it is still
> a hack. I am not super happy about it.

I just skimmed through it, and probably missed some parts. But I sort
of expected to see some console_valid_nocons_seq manipulations in
register_console(), when we register a new CON_PRINTBUFFER console
on already running system.

> Hmm, I seriously think about reverting the commit 375899cddcbb
> ("printk: make sure to print log on console.") and solving it
> another way.

I can agree, definitely. That's one of the options.

	-ss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 18:01 [PATCH 4.19 regression fix] printk: For early boot messages check loglevel when flushing the buffer Hans de Goede
2018-09-05  2:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05  4:53   ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-05  5:36     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05  5:51       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05  8:33       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 11:02         ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-05 15:20           ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-06 14:31             ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-06  7:29           ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-09-06 14:28             ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-07  4:21               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-10 14:57                 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-10 15:02                   ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-11  2:30                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-11  8:47                     ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-12  7:49                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-12 13:33                         ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-13  2:25                           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-06 14:34 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180906072940.GA382@jagdpanzerIV \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox