From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 regression fix] printk: For early boot messages check loglevel when flushing the buffer
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 16:29:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906072940.GA382@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905110207.rxy3upplgkjbk5oi@pathway.suse.cz>
On (09/05/18 13:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> Note that the first registered console prints all messages
> even without this flag.
Hmm, OK, interesting point.
I assumed that the first console usually has CON_PRINTBUFFER bit set.
Or even a CON_PRINTBUFFER | CON_ANYTIME combo. E.g. 8250. It sort of
makes sense to have CON_PRINTBUFFER for the first console. Any later
consoles [e.g. fbcon, netcon] don't necessarily have CON_PRINTBUFFER.
So by the time we have callable console "quite" param should be already
parsed [except the earlycon case perhaps]:
kernel_init_freeable
do_one_initcall
register_console
happens after
setup_arch
parse_early_param
quiet_kernel/debug_kernel.
And
setup_arch
parse_early_param
quiet_kernel/debug_kernel
happens before
console_init
con_init
register_console.
And the first console has CON_PRINTBUFFER bit set. Well, just because
it sounds reasonable. Those were the main assumptions behind my code
snippet. Was any of those assumptions wrong?
> I played with another solution, see the patch below. It defines
> which messages have a valid NOCONS flag according to the msg_seq
> number. IMHO, it is a bit more straightforward but it is still
> a hack. I am not super happy about it.
I just skimmed through it, and probably missed some parts. But I sort
of expected to see some console_valid_nocons_seq manipulations in
register_console(), when we register a new CON_PRINTBUFFER console
on already running system.
> Hmm, I seriously think about reverting the commit 375899cddcbb
> ("printk: make sure to print log on console.") and solving it
> another way.
I can agree, definitely. That's one of the options.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 18:01 [PATCH 4.19 regression fix] printk: For early boot messages check loglevel when flushing the buffer Hans de Goede
2018-09-05 2:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 4:53 ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-05 5:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 5:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 8:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 11:02 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-05 15:20 ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-06 14:31 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-06 7:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-09-06 14:28 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-07 4:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-10 14:57 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-10 15:02 ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-11 2:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-11 8:47 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-12 7:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-12 13:33 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-13 2:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-06 14:34 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180906072940.GA382@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox