From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] x86/mm: fix exception table comments
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:49:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180907194900.DF3B41C0@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907194852.3C351B82@viggo.jf.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
The comments here are wrong. They are too absolute about where
faults can occur when running in the kernel. The comments are
also a bit hard to match up with the code.
Trim down the comments, and make them more precise.
Also add a comment explaining why we are doing the
bad_area_nosemaphore() path here.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/mm/fault.c~pkeys-fault-warnings-03 arch/x86/mm/fault.c
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c~pkeys-fault-warnings-03 2018-09-07 11:21:47.696751898 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c 2018-09-07 11:21:47.700751898 -0700
@@ -1349,24 +1349,25 @@ void do_user_addr_space_fault(struct pt_
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
/*
- * When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to
- * addresses in user space. All other faults represent errors in
- * the kernel and should generate an OOPS. Unfortunately, in the
- * case of an erroneous fault occurring in a code path which already
- * holds mmap_sem we will deadlock attempting to validate the fault
- * against the address space. Luckily the kernel only validly
- * references user space from well defined areas of code, which are
- * listed in the exceptions table.
+ * Kernel-mode access to the user address space should only occur
+ * inside well-defined areas of code listed in the exception
+ * tables. But, an erroneous kernel fault occurring outside one of
+ * those areas which also holds mmap_sem might deadlock attempting
+ * to validate the fault against the address space.
*
- * As the vast majority of faults will be valid we will only perform
- * the source reference check when there is a possibility of a
- * deadlock. Attempt to lock the address space, if we cannot we then
- * validate the source. If this is invalid we can skip the address
- * space check, thus avoiding the deadlock:
+ * Only do the expensive exception table search when we might be at
+ * risk of a deadlock:
+ * 1. We failed to acquire mmap_sem, and
+ * 2. The access was an explicit kernel-mode access
+ * (X86_PF_USER=0).
*/
if (unlikely(!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem))) {
if (!(sw_error_code & X86_PF_USER) &&
!search_exception_tables(regs->ip)) {
+ /*
+ * Fault from code in kernel from
+ * which we do not expect faults.
+ */
bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, sw_error_code, address, NULL);
return;
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-07 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 19:48 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] x86/mm: page fault handling cleanups Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 19:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] x86/mm: clarify hardware vs. software "error_code" Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 22:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-10 20:07 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-10 21:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-07 19:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] x86/mm: break out kernel address space handling Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 21:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-07 21:51 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 22:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-07 22:37 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 19:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] x86/mm: break out user " Dave Hansen
2018-09-08 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-10 20:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 19:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] x86/mm: add clarifying comments for user addr space Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 19:49 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-09-07 21:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] x86/mm: fix exception table comments Sean Christopherson
2018-09-07 21:51 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-10 20:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-08 0:37 ` Jann Horn
2018-09-07 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] x86/mm: add vsyscall address helper Dave Hansen
2018-09-08 0:46 ` Jann Horn
2018-09-07 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] x86/mm/vsyscall: consider vsyscall page part of user address space Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 22:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-08 1:16 ` Jann Horn
2018-09-07 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] x86/mm: remove spurious fault pkey check Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180907194900.DF3B41C0@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).