From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6341C4321E for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C54520870 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:41:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5C54520870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728303AbeIJUgb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:36:31 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:59779 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727411AbeIJUga (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:36:30 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id 759AB80566; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:41:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:41:49 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Jacek Anaszewski Cc: Dan Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver Message-ID: <20180910154149.GA6845@amd> References: <20180906135005.6718-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20180906211617.GB16899@amd> <20180907133228.GA16297@amd> <70f7506c-6a3d-3830-59a4-a246dc6163f7@ti.com> <226b8770-7041-39a4-5a06-6002a7c1225f@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <226b8770-7041-39a4-5a06-6002a7c1225f@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat 2018-09-08 21:53:00, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Dan, >=20 > On 09/07/2018 03:52 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > [...] > >> > >>> And I think Jacek pointed out that the bindings references in this bi= ndings > >>> don't even exist. > >>> > >>> I am thinking we need to deprecate this MFD driver and consolidate th= ese drivers > >>> in the LED directory as we indicated before. I did not find any ti-l= mu support > >>> code. > >>> > >>> ti-lmu common core code and then the LED children appending the featu= re differentiation. > >> > >>> Need some maintainer weigh in here. > >> > >> Hehe. I'm maintnainer. Fun. > >=20 > > I know. I want to see if there was any other opinion. Especially for = the LED driver. > >=20 > [...] >=20 > I have a question - is this lm3697 LED controller a cell of some MFD > device? Or is it a self-contained chip? lm3697 is number for stand-alone device, but same hardware seems to be embedded into multi-functional chips, with other numbers in lm36xx series. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEUEARECAAYFAluWkL0ACgkQMOfwapXb+vImQQCffHlXQV24ag2AVempZPEtociN qZAAl3PXs6dabqtCszyhHbns7S+wrNk= =Aeim -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--