From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, thgarnie@google.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/mm/KASLR: Calculate the actual size of vmemmap region
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:59:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911075946.GA97454@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180911073057.GW1740@192.168.1.3>
* Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> /*
> + * Memory regions randomized by KASLR (except modules that use a separate
> + * logic earlier during boot). Currently they are the physical memory
> + * mapping, vmalloc and vmemmap regions, are ordered based on virtual
> + * addresses. The order is kept after randomization.
> + *
> + * @base: points to various global variables used by the MM to get the
> + * virtual base address of the above regions, which base addresses can
> + * thus be modified by the very early KASLR code to dynamically shape
> + * the virtual memory layout of these kernel memory regions on a per
> + * bootup basis.
> + *
> + * @size_tb: size in TB of each memory region. Thereinto, the size of
> + * the physical memory mapping region is variable, calculated according
> + * to the actual size of system RAM in order to save more space for
> + * randomization. The rest are fixed values related to paging mode.
> */
> static __initdata struct kaslr_memory_region {
> unsigned long *base;
LGTM mostly, except the @size_tb field, see my comments further below.
Here's an edited version:
/*
* 'struct kasl_memory_region' entries represent continuous chunks of
* kernel virtual memory regions, to be randomized by KASLR.
*
* ( The exception is the module space virtual memory window which
* uses separate logic earlier during bootup. )
*
* Currently there are three such regions: the physical memory mapping,
* vmalloc and vmemmap regions.
*
* The array below has the entries ordered based on virtual addresses.
* The order is kept after randomization, i.e. the randomized
* virtual addresses of these regions are still ascending.
*
* Here are the fields:
*
* @base: points to a global variable used by the MM to get the
* virtual base address of any of the above regions. This allows the
* early KASLR code to modify these base addresses early during bootup,
* on a per bootup basis, without the MM code even being aware of whether
* it got changed and to what value.
*
* When KASLR is active then the MM code makes sure that for each region
* there's such a single, dynamic, global base address 'unsigned long'
* variable available for the KASLR code to point to and modify directly:
*
* { &page_offset_base, 0 },
* { &vmalloc_base, 0 },
* { &vmemmap_base, 1 },
*
* @size_tb: size in TB of each memory region. Thereinto, the size of
* the physical memory mapping region is variable, calculated according
* to the actual size of system RAM in order to save more space for
* randomization. The rest are fixed values related to paging mode.
*/
The role of @size_tb is still murky to me. What is it telling us?
Maximum virtual memory range to randomize into? Why does this depend
on system RAM at all - aren't these all virtual addresses in a 64-bit
(well, 48-bit or 56-bit) address ranges?
I could read the code to figure this out, but the comment should already
explain this and it doesn't.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-09 12:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm/KASLR: Fix the wrong calculation of kalsr region initial size Baoquan He
2018-09-09 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/mm/KASLR: Calculate the actual size of vmemmap region Baoquan He
2018-09-10 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-11 7:30 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-11 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-09-11 8:18 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-11 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-11 12:08 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-12 3:18 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-12 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-12 9:41 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-12 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-21 2:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-09 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: Add build time sanity chcek for struct page size Baoquan He
2018-09-10 13:41 ` kbuild test robot
2018-09-11 7:47 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-10 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm/KASLR: Fix the wrong calculation of kalsr region initial size Ingo Molnar
2018-09-11 7:22 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911075946.GA97454@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).