From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: sony-laptop: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:51:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911225121.GE5659@wrath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180707185616.GA7168@taihen.jp>
On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 03:56:17AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 04:24:27PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> > > where we are expecting to fall through.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > > index b205b03..e614cb7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > > @@ -4427,6 +4427,7 @@ sony_pic_read_possible_resource(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context)
> > > default:
> > > dprintk("Resource %d isn't an IRQ nor an IO port\n",
> > > resource->type);
> > > + /* fall through */
> >
> > Here too, I wonder if this is intentional. Either way, from what I can see, the
> > final line in the function:
> >
> > return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
> >
> > Is unreachable as there are no "break" statements in the switch, and the default
> > falls through to return AE_OK. Something doesn't seem right here.
>
> I think so too. Looks to me that the default case was meant to return
> AE_CTRL_TERMINATE (i.e. swapping it to be last would do).
>
> Having written that code aeons ago, I'm not sure if there is a good
> reason to be like that, though it still looks like a bug (that
> existed ever since...).
>
> Want to fix it as part of this patch series? Or I can send a patch
> myself, let me know.
Mattia,
I'd prefer to decouple the fix from the implicit fall through discussion. Please
send a separate fix.
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-05 20:47 [PATCH] platform/x86: sony-laptop: Mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-07-06 23:24 ` Darren Hart
2018-07-07 16:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-07 18:56 ` Mattia Dongili
2018-09-11 22:51 ` Darren Hart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911225121.GE5659@wrath \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox