From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] hung_task: change check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() to use for_each_process_thread_break/continue
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:33:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912163357.GB18748@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180912163312.GA18739@redhat.com>
Change check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() to use the new helpers and remove
the "can_cont" logic from rcu_lock_break().
We could add for_each_process_thread_break/continue right into rcu_lock_break()
but see the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/hung_task.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
index b9132d1..13af558 100644
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -148,20 +148,11 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
* For preemptible RCU it is sufficient to call rcu_read_unlock in order
* to exit the grace period. For classic RCU, a reschedule is required.
*/
-static bool rcu_lock_break(struct task_struct *g, struct task_struct *t)
+static void rcu_lock_break(void)
{
- bool can_cont;
-
- get_task_struct(g);
- get_task_struct(t);
rcu_read_unlock();
cond_resched();
rcu_read_lock();
- can_cont = pid_alive(g) && pid_alive(t);
- put_task_struct(t);
- put_task_struct(g);
-
- return can_cont;
}
/*
@@ -185,16 +176,18 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
hung_task_show_lock = false;
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread(g, t) {
- if (!max_count--)
+ /* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks waiting on NFS */
+ if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+ check_hung_task(t, timeout);
+
+ if (!--max_count)
goto unlock;
if (!--batch_count) {
batch_count = HUNG_TASK_BATCHING;
- if (!rcu_lock_break(g, t))
- goto unlock;
+ for_each_process_thread_break(g, t);
+ rcu_lock_break();
+ for_each_process_thread_continue(&g, &t);
}
- /* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks waiting on NFS */
- if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
- check_hung_task(t, timeout);
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.5.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 16:33 [PATCH 0/2] introduce for_each_process_thread_break() and for_each_process_thread_continue() Oleg Nesterov
2018-09-12 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2018-09-12 19:25 ` Andrew Morton
2018-09-13 15:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-09-12 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180912163357.GB18748@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox