From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=fL2C=MA=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D89ECE564
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73F82150B
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A73F82150B
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1730538AbeIRXLE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:11:04 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59434 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1729999AbeIRXLE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:11:04 -0400
Received: from localhost (unknown [62.119.166.9])
        by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18DFB1083;
        Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>,
        Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared
Message-ID: <20180918173428.GA21591@kroah.com>
References: <20180918165542.4691-1-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
 <20180918165542.4691-3-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180918165542.4691-3-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 06:55:42PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> The naked attribute is supported by at least gcc >= 4.6 (for ARM,
> which is the only current user), gcc >= 8 (for x86), clang >= 3.1
> and icc >= 13. See https://godbolt.org/z/350Dyc
> 
> Therefore, move it out of compiler-gcc.h so that the definition
> is shared by all compilers.
> 
> This also fixes Clang support for ARM32 --- 815f0ddb346c
> ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h mutually exclusive").

So, with this applied, does clang really build an arm32 kernel
successfully?  No other problem at all?  And this isn't really a
regression, arm32 never really worked with clang yet, right?

thanks,

greg k-h