From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove ->dev_ready() hook
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:26:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180919232630.105c3373@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1536305309-28026-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Hi Masahiro,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote on Fri, 7 Sep
2018 16:28:28 +0900:
> The Denali NAND IP has no way to read out the current signal level
> of the R/B# pin. Instead, denali_dev_ready() checks if the R/B#
> transition has already happened. (The INTR__INT_ACT interrupt is
> asserted at the rising edge of the R/B# pin.) It is not a correct
> way to implement the ->dev_ready() hook.
>
> In fact, it has a drawback; in the nand_scan_ident phase, the chip
> detection iterates over maxchips until it fails to find a homogeneous
> chip. For the last loop, nand_reset() fails if no chip is there.
>
> If ->dev_ready hook exists, nand_command(_lp) calls nand_wait_ready()
> after NAND_CMD_RESET. However, we know denali_dev_ready() never
> returns 1 unless there exists a chip that toggles R/B# in that chip
> select. Then, nand_wait_ready() just ends up with wasting 400 msec,
> in the end, shows the "timeout while waiting for chip to become ready"
> warning.
>
> Let's remove the mis-implemented dev_ready hook, and fallback to
> sending the NAND_CMD_STATUS and nand_wait_status_ready(), which
> bails out more quickly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
Both patches applied on nand/next.
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-19 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 7:28 [PATCH 0/2] mtd: rawnand: denali: clean-up unnecessary hook and device reset Masahiro Yamada
2018-09-07 7:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove ->dev_ready() hook Masahiro Yamada
2018-09-19 21:26 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2018-09-07 7:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove denali_reset_banks() Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180919232630.105c3373@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox